Wednesday, May 27, 2026

מתאוננים

 דְּתַנְיָא רַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל אוֹמֵר עֲתִידָה פָּרָשָׁה זוֹ שֶׁתֵּיעָקֵר מִכָּאן וְתִכָּתֵב בִּמְקוֹמָהּ וְלָמָּה כְּתָבָהּ כָּאן כְּדֵי לְהַפְסִיק בֵּין פּוּרְעָנוּת רִאשׁוֹנָה לְפוּרְעָנוּת שְׁנִיָּיה פּוּרְעָנוּת שְׁנִיָּיה מַאי הִיא {במדבר י״א:א׳} וַיְהִי הָעָם כְּמִתְאוֹנְנִים פּוּרְעָנוּת רִאשׁוֹנָה {במדבר י׳:ל״ג} וַיִּסְעוּ מֵהַר ה׳ וְאָמַר רַבִּי חָמָא בְּרַבִּי חֲנִינָא שֶׁסָּרוּ מֵאַחֲרֵי ה׳. 

מאחרי ה׳ – בתוך ג׳ ימים למסעם התאוו האספסוף תאוה להתרעם על הבשר כדי למרוד בהקב״ה. [רש"י] 

ודברי רש"י הק' תמוהים לכל מעיין ומצוה גדולה ליישב. 


The Longest Journey: From the Head to the Heart

“The longest journey you’ll ever take is the eighteen inches from your head to your heart.” This celebrated adage refers to the profound shift from a purely intellectual, mental-based way of interacting with life to an experiential, intuitive, and feeling-based way of being. It is a transition from observing life through a lens to feeling life through the soul.

From the perspective of the "head," truth is a puzzle to be solved through empirical data, science, and provable facts. This is the hallmark of rationalism—the narrative upon which Western society has "bet the farm." In this paradigm, truth is viewed as a singular, external monolith, separate from the observer and governed by rigid laws.

However, from the perspective of the "heart," truth is subjective and internal. It is a personal wisdom that synthesizes our senses, intuition, and emotional knowing. As Blaise Pascal famously wrote:

“The heart has its reasons which reason knows nothing of.”

As a culture, we have yet to complete this journey; in many ways, we appear to be walking backward, retreating further into the safety of data at the expense of depth.

The Throne of Reason

Rooted in the Western intellectual tradition, our society prizes the factual, science-based approach to existence. We are taught that all truths can be deciphered using the deductive and analytical mind. While many non-Western traditions honor the heart and body as vital centers of intelligence, the rationalist narrative places all its eggs in the intellectual basket. In this world, reason is king.

What this narrative overlooks, however, is that reason never exists in a vacuum. Logic is always filtered through the messy reality of human experience. As Anaïs Nin aptly noted:

“We don’t see things as they are, we see them as we are.”

Our "pure" reasoning is constantly subverted by our emotions, language, power structures, and cultural conditioning. The person applying the logic is inseparable from the logic itself.

The Myth of the Singular Truth

The rational narrative assumes a singular, universal truth. Consequently, when we argue for the validity of our personal experience, we often mistakenly believe we are arguing for the only real truth. It is difficult for the ego to accept that what we perceive is merely a byproduct of our conditioning. To accept our truth as relative would mean accepting that someone else’s conflicting experience could be equally valid.

Yet, realizing that infinite truths can coexist is the key to liberation. As the poet Walt Whitman declared:

“Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain multitudes.)”

When we stop believing that our story is the "one true reality" and that dissenters must be converted, we find true freedom. We no longer need the world to agree with us to feel validated. We can let others’ realities exist alongside our own, accepting their experience as real for them. Our truth becomes just one thread in an infinite tapestry, allowing us to wear our own stories with a newfound lightness.

The Fear of the Unknown

Our cultural conditioning has taught us that the unknown is a threat. If the mind cannot "figure it out," we feel vulnerable and out of control. We are raised to believe that "I don’t know" is a failure rather than a doorway.

“Be patient toward all that is unresolved in your heart and try to love the questions themselves, like locked rooms and like books that are now written in a very foreign tongue.”

The rational narrative insists we should understand everything. If we can’t, we feel we have failed. Our inner narrator is so uncomfortable with uncertainty that she will finagle facts and invent "why-stories" just to provide a sense of cohesion. We would often rather cling to a painful explanation than face the void of no explanation at all.

Waking from the Narrative Trance

The reality is that much of life—especially the complexity of human behavior—is unexplainable. Life is infinitely vaster and more mysterious than the intellect can decipher. By hanging onto the belief that everything has a rational "why," we grant our inner narrator permanent tenure over our lives.

Waking up from this "narrative trance" is about more than just noticing our personal stories; it is about examining the soil in which those stories grew. It is about recognizing the paradigms we’ve been fed and how they have shaped our definition of "truth."

As Carl Jung suggested:

“Your visions will become clear only when you can look into your own heart. Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes.”

When we finally accept that reality is a changing perception filtered through lived experience, our entire system relaxes. The struggle to be "right" evaporates. We open ourselves to radically different, more fulfilling connections and, ultimately, to a profound sense of peace. At last, the struggle is over—everyone can be right, because everyone is living their own truth.

----

Note: This is NOT about religious and spiritual relativism. We believe באמונה שלימה that there is one truth and one truth alone - that השם אחד ושמו אחד, Torah Mi-Sinai etc. etc. All other religions and belief systems are unequivocally false [to varying degrees. Pure paganism is more false than Christianity and different streams of Christianity are more or less false]. 

This is about our own personal stories that we are constantly telling ourselves about everything we see and experience which most people conflate with Absolute Truth. It is not. It is just a story. Your story. One story among many. This doesn't mean that you have to negate your story. Just that we should all make room for alternative stories. This would solve must tension in both our personal lives and in Jewish society at large.

הרב שלמה זלמן בן חנה

 Terrible car accident from which his wife and baby died בר מינן. 

 

Parents Help Graduate Sound Out The Words On Diploma

TUCSON, AZ — Parents of high school graduate David Simpson helped their son sound out the words on his diploma after the teen expressed frustration at not being able to read the words on the piece of paper.

"Sound it out, sweetie," David's mom, Nancy, told her son. "H-I-G-H-S-C-H... yes, it's 'high school!' good job! You're doing so great."

Simpson told his friends he thought he'd eventually learn how to read in school, but his teachers mostly focused on how to be more gay and how to overthrow capitalism.

"In English class, my teacher mostly told us about how to protest Trump and what she thought about abortion laws," he said. "I thought maybe we'd go over phonics at some point, but... nope! Never."

Simpson's parents said they were proud of the progress their son has been making, but said they are a little concerned that he can't read.

"We helped him sound out all the words on his diploma, but we can't be with him in college, and I worry things are going to get harder for our little illiterate champ."

At publishing time, Simpson asked his parents to help him sound out the letters on the EXIT sign in the auditorium as he was having trouble leaving the graduation ceremony.

---

Not satire: At Dartmouth, for example, you can attend such courses such as - 

Transnational Feminisms.

The Politics of Fashion.

Queer Visual Culture.

I personally, being a native Manhattanite, am considering going back to Columbia and majoring in "Black Feminist Theory: Exploring the intellectual tradition of Black women thinkers and their critiques of mainstream feminism and patriarchy."



Everyone In Chicago Shot Over The Weekend

CHICAGO, IL — The Chicago Police Department confirmed on Tuesday morning that every single resident of the city had been shot over the long holiday weekend.


According to officials, the shootings began on Friday evening and did not stop until 100 percent of the population had sustained at least one bullet wound. Hospital staff reported that waiting rooms were somewhat crowded as approximately 2.6 million people arrived at the same time to seek medical treatment.


"It was a busy few days," said police spokesperson Thomas Dewey while receiving medical treatment for a gunshot wound. "We generally expect a spike in activity during the warmer months, but the complete and total victimization of the entire municipal population was a bit higher than our internal projections."


City leaders noted that despite the massive injuries, public transit remained operational and municipal offices opened on time Tuesday morning. Residents were seen commuting to work with ice packs, slings, and various levels of bandages, ready to face the increased likelihood of being shot again.


At publishing time, Mayor Brandon Johnson urged citizens to remain calm and emphasized that the city was still entirely safe for tourism, provided visitors wear full body armor and avoid the corporate limits.

האם הצבא קדוש מעצם הגדרתו

עפ"י מכתב שראיתי לראש ישיבת הסדר:

לכבוד וכו' שליט"א,

שלום וברכה,

זכיתי לשמוע את שיעורו של הדר"ג .... לפרשת בהעלותך. ברשות הרב, ברצוני להעיר ולהקשות מעט על הדברים שנאמרו.

לעניות דעתי, קשה להחיל את הגדרת הרמב"ן – שהמחנה הצבאי הוא כ"מקדש השם" – על צה"ל בימינו. בצבא המקראי, ההנהגה הייתה בידי משה רבינו ויהשע, וההחלטות התקבלו על פי רוח הקודש וההלכה. יתרה מכך, מי שהיה "ירא מעבירות שבידו" היה חוזר מעורכי המלחמה, כך שהמחנה היה מורכב מאנשים קדושים בלבד.

כיום, הצבא מורכב מכלל ישראל על כל גווניו [וגם הרבה מאד גויים], ואינו מנוהל על פי חוקי התורה. 

אם אכן נגדיר את המחנה כ"מקדש", הרי שהמציאות השוררת בו – שירות משותף של בנים ובנות, וקשיים רוחניים הגורמים לחיילים רבים לשנות את דרכם הדתית – הופכת לבעייתית שבעתיים. כפי ששמענו ממורנו הגאון הרב יעקב כ"ץ שליט"א, בעיות צניעות מסוימות בצבא הן בגדר "יהרג ואל יעבור". אוי ואבוי אם ב"מקדש" קיימות פרצות חמורות כל כך.

כתר"ה התבטא בחריפות שיש להימנע מקטרוג ולבלום את פינו מביקורת. אך אני תמה: האם אין זה תפקידנו דווקא לזעוק על הפרצות הללו מתוך דאגה ורצון לתיקון? האם השתיקה אינה מחלישה את התביעה לקדושה בתוך המחנה?

אשמח להבהרת דעתו של הרב בעניין.

בכבוד רב ובהערכה כנה,

---- ---