Wednesday, October 7, 2026

The Devaluation Of A Narcissist And How To Deal With One

The devaluation stage in a narcissistic relationship marks a calculated shift from affection to hostility and psychological erosion.

Emotional Withdrawal and Feigned Ignorance: The partner first notices increasing emotional distance. Everyday interactions are met with flat indifference, condescending body language, and feigned confusion. When asked about their withdrawal, the individual reacts with exaggerated disbelief, as though the concern is irrational.

Chronic Invalidation and Provocation: Active listening disappears, replaced by overt dismissal and contempt. Passive-aggressive behavior—such as muttering derogatory remarks within earshot—is used to provoke an emotional reaction. Once the partner reacts, the narrative is flipped, framing the partner as contentious or unreasonable.

The Silent Treatment and Contradiction: Days of ostracism and selective mutism are used to assert control. The individual systematically contradicts basic realities simply to disorient the partner and destabilize their confidence in shared facts.

Gaslighting and Identity Erosion: Frequent minor deceptions force the partner into chronic self-doubt. Over time, the partner compromises their own values, boundaries, and identity in an unsustainable effort to placate an unappeasable standard.

Contempt and Dehumanization: As detachment solidifies, engagement becomes rare. The partner is treated as an inconvenience or an adversary, subjected to overt disparagement and constant criticism.

DARVO and the Smear Campaign: Any attempt to hold the individual accountable is met with DARVO (Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender). To safeguard their public standing, the narcissist orchestrates a preemptive smear campaign, framing the partner as abusive or erratic while concealing the abuse that occurs privately.

While devaluation systematically undermines a partner's autonomy and well-being, it typically functions as the staging ground for the final discard phase.

How to deal with a narcissist

Dealing with a narcissist can leave you doubting yourself, walking on eggshells, and exhausted by conversations that never seem to land fairly. You can't change how they think — but you can change how you respond, and that's where your power is.


The most effective way to deal with a narcissist is to stay calm, keep your expectations realistic, and set firm boundaries you actually enforce. Don't try to win arguments or get them to admit fault — protect your time, energy, and emotional reactions instead.


What to say

The goal isn't to win — it's to stay grounded. Narcissistic behavior is largely a game of bait-and-response. When you stop reacting emotionally, you remove the payoff. Keep responses short, factual, and unbothered. Precision matters more than volume here: fewer words delivered calmly land harder than a long, wounded explanation.


A few scripts that work across different situations:


When they bait you into an argument: "I see it differently, and I'm not going to argue about it." Then drop it. You don't need to make them agree — you just need to not take the bait.

When they push a boundary you've set: "That doesn't work for me." Say it once, then stop. No justification. No apology. If they push further, repeat it exactly: "That still doesn't work for me."

When they rewrite events to make you look bad: "That's not how I remember it. Let's leave it there." This doesn't invite debate. It asserts your reality without launching into a point-by-point defense they'll dismantle.

When they guilt-trip you: "I understand you're upset. My answer is still no." Acknowledging the feeling without capitulating to it is one of the hardest things to do here — and one of the most effective.

When they go silent to punish you: "I'm here when you're ready to talk normally." Then go do something else. Chasing the silence rewards the behavior.

Notice the pattern: every response is short, calm, and final. Narcissists are skilled at dragging extended conversations into territory where you're forced to defend yourself on their terms. Don't enter that territory.


What not to say

What you avoid saying matters as much as what you say. These responses tend to backfire:


"You're acting like a narcissist" or "You're a narcissist." Diagnostic labels almost always escalate conflict rather than create insight. Even if it's accurate, hearing it as a diagnosis from you won't prompt reflection — it will trigger defensiveness and possibly retaliation. Save the label for your therapist or a trusted friend, not the conversation itself.

Long explanations of why you feel hurt. If you spend five minutes explaining all the reasons their behavior was wrong, you've handed them five minutes of material to argue against. They will find the weakest point and attack it. The more you explain, the more you signal that their approval matters to you.

Threats you won't follow through on. "If you do that again, I'm leaving" only works if you actually leave when they do it again. Empty threats teach narcissists that your limits aren't real — they'll test you more, not less. Only say what you'll actually do.

"You never" and "you always." Absolutes invite nitpicking and derailment ("I did apologize once, in March 2019"). They also shift the conversation from the specific incident to a historical debate you can't win. Stay specific: "When you did X yesterday, I felt Y."

Trying to make them feel guilty. Guilt requires a certain kind of empathy that is genuinely diminished in narcissistic behavior patterns. Appealing to how hurt you are typically produces either dismissal ("you're too sensitive") or a performance of concern that passes when the immediate moment does.

Why this works

Narcissistic behavior is sustained by two things: control and emotional reactions. When you react with visible hurt, anger, or desperation, you confirm that the behavior has power. When you stay calm and give minimal information — sometimes called the "gray rock" method, because you're trying to be as interesting as a gray rock — you remove the payoff.


Boundaries work for a related but different reason. A boundary isn't a request for someone to behave differently. It's a statement of what you'll do. "If you call me names, I'll end the call" isn't trying to change them — it's describing your own action. That distinction matters because you control your actions. You don't control theirs. Enforcing a boundary doesn't require their cooperation, which means it doesn't depend on their goodwill.


Consistency is the part most people struggle with. The first time you hold a boundary calmly, it might seem to work. The second time, they escalate — because they're testing whether the limit is real. This is expected behavior, not evidence that the boundary failed. Holding it a second time, a third time, a tenth time — that's what teaches the new pattern.


If it's a partner

Safety comes first. If the relationship involves any form of abuse — physical, financial, isolation from friends and family — that changes the calculus, and talking to a domestic violence hotline or therapist before trying to "manage" the relationship more skillfully is the right step. Strategies like gray rock and boundary-setting are tools for survivable situations, not substitutes for safety planning when you need one.


If the relationship doesn't cross into abuse, couples therapy is worth considering — but only if your partner is genuinely willing to engage and the therapist is experienced with high-conflict dynamics. Therapy can become another arena for manipulation when one partner is skilled at performing insight without internalizing it. Go in with realistic expectations and a therapist who won't be easily charmed.


Some people decide to stay while practicing distance — emotionally, if not physically. Lowering the amount of personal information you share (sometimes called an "information diet"), keeping interactions transactional, and investing your emotional energy in other relationships can make a high-conflict partnership more survivable while you figure out your longer-term path.


If leaving is on the table, doing it with support — a therapist, trusted friends, a lawyer if assets or children are involved — tends to go better than a sudden exit. Narcissistic partners often escalate when they sense loss of control.


If it's a parent

Guilt is almost always part of this picture. If you grew up with a narcissistic parent, some part of you has likely internalized the message that your needs are excessive and their reactions are your fault. Recognizing that voice as a learned pattern — not the truth — is slow, often painful work, and usually benefits from a therapist who specializes in family of origin issues.


Practically: the same gray rock and brief-response techniques apply. You don't owe your parent access to your emotional inner life. An "information diet" — sharing the surface news (work is fine, the kids are great) without sharing anything that could be weaponized — is not deceptive. It's self-protection.


Limited contact, or contact only in settings where they're less likely to escalate (public places, group gatherings), is a tool many people find useful before deciding on full no-contact. There's no single right answer, and changing your level of contact is something you can do gradually rather than as an all-or-nothing choice.


If it's a coworker or boss

When you can't exit the relationship, documentation and process become your friends. Keep a record — dates, direct quotes, witnesses — of interactions that feel unfair or inappropriate. Route conflict through official channels where possible: email creates a paper trail that verbal confrontations don't.


Keep the relationship transactional. You don't need to be liked or understood by this person. You need to do your work, be professional, and protect your reputation. Be especially careful about what you share in unguarded moments — details about your private life, ambitions, or frustrations with your job can become leverage.


If the behavior rises to harassment or creates a hostile work environment, HR and employment law exist for that purpose. Know what your organization's policies are before you need them.


Frequently asked questions

What is the best way to respond to a narcissist?

Stay calm, keep your responses short and factual, and avoid defending yourself against bait. Narcissists escalate when they get an emotional reaction, so a neutral 'I see it differently, and I'm not going to argue about it' is often more effective than explaining yourself.


Should you go no contact with a narcissist?

No contact can be the healthiest option when the relationship is abusive and change isn't possible. When that's not realistic — a co-parent or coworker — 'gray rock' (being deliberately unreactive and boring) plus firm boundaries is the common alternative.


How do narcissists react to boundaries?

Often with anger, guilt-tripping, or testing the limit repeatedly. That reaction is expected, not a sign you did it wrong. Hold the boundary calmly and consistently rather than re-explaining it.


Tuesday, October 6, 2026

קבלת עול

 מספר הרב יצחק שפרינגר: באחת הקהילות היהודיות בארצות הברית אירע מקרה מצער אשתו של ראש הקהילה נתפסה במכס על סכום גדול והיה צפוי לה משפט חמור שיכול להסתיים אף בכלא. ראש הקהילה ידע את הכתובת למי לפנות והרבי הורה ברור לנסוע לפלורידה. מה הקשר פלורידה אף אחד לא יכול לדעת אבל הרבי אומר והשליח מסביר שמה שהרבי אומר חייבים לקיים. ראש הקהילה יוצא לפלורידה בלי לדעת לאן מועדות פניו. ידידינו התיישב במסעדה מקומית כשעל פניו ניכר הצער והבכי. אדם חביב וטוב סבר התעניין בדאגותיו ואז מתברר ליהודי שמדובר בשופט הממונה על התיק. תוצאות המשפט היו צפויות ושמו של הרבי התגדל והתקדש. כשהגיעו הדברים חזרה לרבי אמר "סבורים אתם שהמופת הוא בבית המשפט? המופת האמיתי שאותו יהודי שמע בקולי ויצא לפלורידה בקבלת עול". 

חשש יראת שמיים

אל הגראי"ל שטיינמן זצ"ל נכנס פעם יהודי ליטאי ושטח בפניו את מצוקתו בנו החל ללמוד תניא. הגראי"ל שהיה יהודי פיקח ובעל דעה ישרה נוסף על שאר מעלותיו ענה לו בשאלה "ממה אתה חושש? האם אתה חושש שהוא ייעשה יהודי ירא שמים כתוצאה מכך?" 

Existential Threat From Political Party

A kippah wearing member of the Yisrael Beiteinu party said among other things that tens of thousands of Charedim are *criminals* for learning in Yeshiva and not serving in the army b/c it goes against their religion [as they understand it and as they have been instructed by their rabbonim] and not only should they receive no benefits but should also be denied drivers licenses. 

He is also in favor of legalizing the union of two men who will live carnally as husband and husband and calling it *marriage* [and of course unions between Jews and Gentiles]. 

"ולא תקיא הארץ אתכם בטמאכם אותה". 

Monday, October 5, 2026

FBI Assembles Elite Team Of Investigators To See If All These Terrorist Attacks Can Somehow Be Connected To A Single Ideology

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In response to the attempted hijacking of FlyDubai Flight 1073, the Federal Bureau of Investigation reportedly formed an elite task force to determine if all these terrorist attacks can somehow be connected to a single ideology.

Federal agents confirmed that they would be analyzing several terrorist attacks going back several decades to determine if the suspects, all of whom happened to be Muslim, shared a common motive and were even perhaps linked to one another in some way.

"We're searching for any type of pattern here," FBI Director Kash Patel said, "but we're just not sure if these terrorists can be connected to a single ideology that would help us understand not only why they sacrificed their lives to kill others, but also where they may strike again."

The Bureau will reportedly be pouring through hours of security footage of prior attacks as well as archive footage of terrorists explaining what motivated them to become suicide bombers or kill innocent civilians, Christians, and Jews.

"I think we're very close to figuring out the connection, but for all we know these are all isolated incidents conducted by dozens of lone nuts," Patel said. "We're just not sure."

Special Agent Mark Hunter, who is heading up the task force, said he first suspected Islam as the uniting ideology until he was reminded it's supposed to be the religion of peace. "That certainly wouldn't make sense then," Hunter said. "However, we have noticed that a lot of terrorists watched Friends, so we're seriously considering the possibility they were all radicalized by Matt LeBlanc."

At publishing time, the FBI had formed another task force comprised of Muslims to make sure that the first task force is being objective.


 

חוסר געשמאק

לאחר שסיים הגרנ"ב את לימודיו בישיבת רבינו יצחק אלחנן הוא קיבל משרת רבנות אי שם בעיר רחוקה בארצות הברית. במקום בו שימש כרב, לא היה לו עם מי לדבר ברמה שלו. היחיד שיכל לדבר עמו ולהשיח את לבו בפניו היה שליח של הרבי שפעל בקירוב מקום אליו. הבדידות במקום רבנותו היתה קשה עליו, ובזמן מסויים הקושי שבשהייה שם גבר והוא הרגיש כי באו מים עד נפש והחליט לעזוב את המקום. 

משסיפר זאת לחבירו השליח הגיב הלה כי צעד כזה לא עושים לבד ויש להתייעץ על כך עם אחד מגדולי הדור והציע לו להתייעץ עם הרבי בנידון. 

הגר"נ שהיה מודע לסדרי היחידות אצל הרבי דחה את ההצעה משום שעד שיתפנה תור ליחידות אצל הרבי יעבור זמן רב. על טענתו זו ענה לו השליח שהוא יסדר עבורו תוך זמן קצר תור ליחידות ואכן כך היה. ביחידות שטח בפני הרבי את רצונו לעזוב את המקום ופירט את הנימוקים לכך. 

הרבי הסביר לו מדוע שהייתו במקום נחוצה ומוכרחת ושלל את טיעוניו אחד לאחד. לבסוף אמר הגר"נ שאין לו שום געשמאק בשהייתו שם. מששמע זאת הרבי דפק בידו על השולחן ואמר לגר"נ "און איך האב יא א געשמאק אין זיצן דא אנשטאט זיצן מיט א גמרא און לערנין?".