Tuesday, April 30, 2024

Smile

Do you know what I love most about baseball? The pine tar, the resin, the grass, the dirt. And that’s just in the hot dogs. 

I’ve been getting into astronomy so I installed a skylight. The people who live above me are furious.

When I meet a new person I like to talk about global warming. It's a real ice-breaker. 

You don’t need a parachute to go skydiving. You need a parachute to go skydiving twice.

Every time you feel yourself being pulled into other people's drama, repeat these word: Not my circus, not my monkeys.

"Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't." Margaret Thatcher





Progressive Racism

Prof. Sam Lehman Wilzig

When people protest against war and humanitarian crises, three questions arise: 1) Is their goal to alleviate suffering or to vilify those responsible for the calamity? 2) Should the skin color of the victims and their “persecutors” influence the nature and even existence of the protest? 3) Assuming that one can’t protest against every humanitarian disaster in the world, should the number of victims be decisive in deciding which to demonstrate against (or offering a solution)?

Anyone calling themselves a “humanitarian progressive” should answer the first question with “suffering alleviation” as the primary goal of such protest. The second question should be even easier to answer (especially for “progressives”): a person is a person, whether white, black or any shade in between. The third question is the most straightforward of all: of course the number of fatalities and those suffering from other forms of serious suffering is an important factor.

The vast majority of contemporary westerners protesting against Israel today fail these three cardinal tests. In short, they are not really progressive but rather what I would call “selective progressive racists.” “Racist” in that skin color does count for them (big time!); “Selective” because they ignore the number of victims, focusing almost exclusively on the perpetrators to the detriment of most any constructive suggestions for alleviating or ending the conflict.

One can understand Palestinians who protest against Israel (even if their case is tendentiously one-sided). But western non-Palestinians supporting their cause are precisely the “selective progressive racists” noted above. Here’s why, based on a mere three examples around the world these very days (unfortunately, one could add several more, but these will suffice).

Sudan is undergoing a humanitarian crisis of monumental proportions, starting a year ago. Airstrikes have hit civilian centers on an ongoing basis; vigilantes (militiamen too) loot neighborhoods. In many regions, hospitals and health services hardly function. Worst of all, thousands of civilians have been killed, including massacres that are clear war crimes. And they might be the lucky ones, as there are numerous eyewitness accounts of rape and other forms of sexual violence. In addition, the UN reports that approximately 19,000,000 (million!) Sudanese children are out of school, among them 3,000,000 malnourished.

Why isn’t food aid arriving? As The Economist recently reported: “Within Sudan, WFP trucks have been blocked, hijacked, attacked, looted and detained. Outside Sudan, makeshift camps are swollen with hungry and sick arrivals — but there’s no money to feed them.”

All this sounds like what protesters are throwing at Israel – but in staggeringly higher numbers of dead and starving. Yet not a peep is heard from the world’s “progressives.” Black lives matter? Yes, but for them only in America.

Next, let’s jump across the world – to Myanmar, the most violent war in the world today, with an estimated 50,000 dead since the military coup in 2021, and over two million displaced. Most of this is due to the military junta’s blanket use of air strikes and shelling of mostly civilian targets.

Here too one would be hard pressed to find any “progressive” protests against the illegitimate and ruthless Myanmar military government. If overseas black lives don’t matter, then brown lives to them matter even less.

Finally, back to Africa. This time we’re dealing with past and present. Since the turn of the millennium, the Ethiopian conflict has led to more than 500,000 dead soldiers and around 350,000 civilian fatalities – probably the deadliest conflict in decades anywhere in the world. Here too the fighters took part in numerous atrocities in general and sexual violence specifically. That war “ended” a year and a half ago, but has now started up again (somewhat different combatants). According to the UN, close to 30,000,000 people now require emergency food aid – and if that doesn’t arrive soon, many will be starving in the near future.

Have you seen any protests at Harvard or Columbia (et al) regarding such mind-boggling suffering? Of course not – those involve “blacks” without American citizenship. Moreover, it isn’t clear which group is the perpetrator and which the victim. So without a clear “evil (colonialist?) persecutor” to go after, why bother helping the victims?

When one realizes the disparity between the number of Gazan fatalities (a bit over 30,000 if the Hamas-based numbers can be believed – not to mention that at least 10,000 of these are the terrorist militants themselves), and the humongous numbers around the globe noted above, it becomes clear that even if antisemitism is not driving most of the pro-Palestinian protesters, subtle “progressive racism” is certainly a factor in singling out Israel when the devastation and humanitarian crises are far worse elsewhere.

Israelis are racist? The protesters should look in the mirror. Their avoidance of the greatest political-human tragedies in the world today constitutes the real racism here.

Polite Response To A Missionary

“I’m sorry, but my religion does not permit conversion.”


Challenging The Prevailing Consensus

 Adam Hummel 

Why is this Passover different from all other Passovers?

I just Googled this question and got at least 32 different results back of articles (and at least three YouTube videos) asking the exact same question.

See?

Without reading all the results, the answer is obvious: This year, at least 100 of our fellow Jews are not free. It feels almost impossible then to celebrate Zman Cherusenu - the time of our freedom - while our brothers and sisters remain captive in Gaza.

But the key word there is almost. It is almost impossible, because we will celebrate. Even with the yellow flowers on, or empty seats at, each of our tables this year (which we did do), we will still be celebrating. We welcomed our guests to our table and applauded when our youngest children successfully (or semi-successfully) asked the four questions. We drank our four cups, sang Dayeinu, some licked the wine from our pinkies after we dripped out the ten plagues, and we wondered why, oh why, with inflation being what it is, the price of a baby goat is still just two zuzim.

So, this is not an article about why this Passover is different. Instead, I am going to write about why it is just the same. And why this is a remarkable accomplishment of Jewish power year after year.

Why is there antisemitism?

Several months ago, I was asked to run a session on antisemitism at a small hedge fund with about 15 employees. Given what’s been going on in the world, the manager wanted his staff to understand what antisemitism is and where it comes from.

I met them at their offices at lunchtime. While everyone munched on salad, I ran a 45-minute session on the history of antisemitism, from classic to medieval to Nazi to modern, left-wing, right-wing, and Islamist. The vast majority of the room was not Jewish.

As I concluded and opened up to questions, one of the managers immediately asked: “Why is there antisemitism? I appreciate that you’ve given an overview of what antisemitism was and is, how its manifested, and who spews it, but surely there must be a reason why this intolerance has persisted.”

I took a breath. After learning the history of cruelty against my community, did this guy just say, “Well, there must be a reason why everyone hates you people”?

But he wasn’t accusing. He was genuinely asking how thousands of years of this treatment has persisted, from the dusty roads of Judaea to the streets of Downtown Toronto.

I responded that many think of antisemitism as the world’s oldest conspiracy theory. It’s described as such because the breadth of antisemitism is nonsensical, and because of how long it has persisted in falsely blaming Jews for societal and global problems.

I continued however that though there is no rational basis for antisemitism, that one of the reasons for it is likely the fact that Jews are always perceived as different. Though that doesn’t justify the way Jews have been treated, it’s probably part of the explanation as to why we have always been looked at with confusion, suspicion, and/or disdain.

The questioner seemed satisfied by that answer, but I wasn’t. While answering other questions about the IHRA definition of antisemitism, Kanye West (yemach shemo), and anti-Zionism vs. antisemitism, something in the back of my head kept nagging me to find a better answer to the question of, “Why is there antisemitism?”

An alternative to power

Someone recently pointed me to an explanation that I think makes the most sense. Unsurprisingly, it comes from Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks z’l. His explanation is ultimately that Judaism is a counter-cultural religion, that is a constant critique of the mainstream. It’s not just that people don’t like that we are different, but they don’t like that our beliefs are antithetical to theirs. The easiest example of this is Christianity: once the earliest Christians decided that Jesus was the messiah, they resented Jews who continued to practice their religion that believed he wasn't.

Rabbi Sacks argued that Judaism was founded as an alternative to the worship of power.

When God first appeared to Abraham, he told him to leave his land of idol worshippers and go to a new one that God would show him - the Land of Israel. Why? Not just to be rebellious, but to start something new: “A religion that will not worship power and the symbols of power.” With Abraham, a new religion started that would challenge the prevailing consensus both then and now.

Rabbi Sacks wrote,

In the first chapter of Genesis we are told that every human being is in the image and likeness of God…It is a political statement of potentially explosive force. The kings and pharaohs of the ancient world were seen as gods, the children of the gods, or the sole intermediary of the gods. They presided over hierarchical societies in which there was an absolute, ontological difference between rulers and ruled. By stating that not just the king, but everyone, is in the image of God, the Bible was opposing the entire political universe of the ancient world…

The Hebrew Bible is a sustained protests against empire, hierarchy, ruling elites, and the enslavement of the masses.

To be a Jew is to be willing to challenge the prevailing consensus when, as so often happens, nations slip into worshipping the old gods.

For the last 3,000 years, the Jewish people have done just this. We have dared to be different, even though doing so has come at a significant cost. This has infuriated many throughout history, but here we remain: 15 million strong, in a sea of rising torment. “A counter-voice in the conversation of humankind,” says Sacks.

Our Sages say that Abraham was called “Ha’Ivri” - the “Hebrew” because “all the world was on one side (be-ever echad) and he was on the other.” My God, has that ever felt more appropriate than it does today?!?

That’s us, at the bottom.

At a time when antisemitism is at an all time high, and it seems like an easy way out is just to side with the mob (as cowardly groups like Jewish Voices for Peace and Independent Jewish Voices do), the Jewish community stands resolute. The whole world is on one side, and once again, we are on the other. Whether in the hallways at the UN, on campuses like Columbia or Harvard or Concordia or York, defending our Canadian synagogues, or standing up against the slew of hatred online, we are once again fighting the same old fight: us against the world.

Passover and Power

So what does all this have to do with Passover? Well, I find this holiday incredibly empowering, especially this year.

Thousands of years ago, an 80 year old man with a speech impediment, who had only just learned of his Hebrew ancestry, went up against the almighty Egyptian Pharaoh, and won. For 400 years, the Hebrews had languished as slaves in Egypt. Their numbers grew, despite the fact that each generation must have known that they were just giving birth to future slaves. However, though their lives were bitter and their backs were bent, they maintained their Hebrew identities. They refused to assimilate. Historians note that strangely, even after 400 years in Egypt, there is almost no Egyptian linguistic influence in the Hebrew language. That is astonishingly stubborn.

And it’s not like these were seasoned Jews either. According to the Biblical chronology, monotheistic Judaism was fairly new at that time! Abraham had Isaac who had Jacob who had Joseph who led the Hebrews in Egypt. A new Pharaoh took the throne “who knew not Joseph,” and he enslaved the Hebrews for 210 years. That’s it!

This was not the Judaism of today, with the writings and the commentary and the wizened witty rabbis and the jokes: this was a simple but revolutionary new movement, in which every single Hebrew believed that he was created in the image of God. Those Hebrews who became the generation of the Exodus, did not know if they would ever be led out of Egypt, let alone by a stuttering old shepherd. But they maintained their identities, with the unending belief that they would, one day, be redeemed.

My good friend Rabbi Isaac Choua recently shared a question once asked by our sages: “Is it appropriate to recite avadim hayinu (we were once slaves) during the Pesach seder, if there are still captives today?”

Can we say that we were slaves when we are still in captivity?

Well the answer to that, is yes, we can. Why? Well, as Rabbi Choua writes,

We have always celebrated Passover both during times of freedom and captivity. Doing so does not minimize the realities of current suffering, but underscores a core Jewish value: Hope.

Jews maintain hope; Pesach embodies hope in its purest form. Without discussing hope, we are confined to despair.

This approach isn’t about ignoring pain or injustice; it’s about affirming hope and perseverance as acts of “emuna” (faith) and as resistance against despair.

Even in the darkest times, there is a place for gratitude, for remembering past deliverances, and for looking forward with hope toward future redemption.

Oftentimes, the smallest things make us mighty. As Jewish history shows, it is not our feats of strength that make us a formidable people. It is what we believe, our willingness to be different, our motivations that push us from one day to the next, and how we treat others, that keeps us strong.

Rabbi Sacks described Abraham as the supreme example in all of history of influence without power. He was prepared to be different, and this is a mission that every subsequent Jew has taken on throughout all of history. People take notice, for better or for worse, when someone dares to be different, and what we are going through today is simply 2024’s iteration of our daring to be different.

Been here before

When put into this context, I take comfort in what is going on today - let me explain. Now, I cannot fathom the experience of the hostages or their families. I cannot imagine that those with loved ones held captive in Gaza can read what I wrote above and feel that same hope, 200 days after their loved ones were taken from them. This is the heartache that echoes through Jewish history.

But we have been here before. Jews went underground to observe the Passover seder during the Spanish Inquisition, the Holocaust, and the dark days of the Soviet Union. Unsure if they would ever emerge, able to once again practice their rituals in public, they kept the faith, asked the questions, and remembered how thousands of years ago, we - the same Jews with the same beliefs - went from slavery to freedom. And to them, this was not some no-name universal idea of freedom. It was freedom to go somewhere: Israel. To the Promised Land.

This year, we celebrate just the same as in years past. In doing so, perhaps especially this year, we sustain our critique of power. Today, the mob appears to be perfectly fine with the idea of 100+ Jews held captive. They are fine acting in a way designed to intimidate us, breaking the windows of synagogues or shouting at fellow Jewish students at Columbia University in New York to “Go back to Poland!”

What these bullies who seek to wield power today however forget, is that each year, we celebrate a holiday that reminds us that our strength is not determined by their might. This is a rejuvenating reminder.

This Passover, as we gather with our families, recount the story of how we became a nation, and proclaim “Next Year in Jerusalem!” we refresh ourselves, hit reset, and remember what makes us unique. We don’t need an empire. We don’t seek converts. We don’t ask forgiveness from our enemies, nor do we want their approval. We don’t wallow in our sorrow, and we don’t accept battlefield losses. We don’t let others determine our fate.

We are the world’s foremost experts of dusting ourselves off, learning from our past, redoubling our efforts, and infuriating our critics when their barbs fail to stop us. It is a type of power that is ingrained in the Jewish people and the State of Israel.

In doing so, we exercise an unstoppable form of power. So, we celebrate this year, as we celebrated last year, as we will celebrate next year too, hopefully, with our brothers and sisters back at our side, speaking once again of how we once were captive, but now are free.


Monday, April 29, 2024

A history lesson for America's rioting students: Will they ever learn?

Victor Sharpe 

Mahmoud Abbas, the Holocaust denying head of Terror, Inc, aka the Palestinian Authority, the same brute who glories in his ‘Pay to Slay’ abomination in which he rewards Palestinian Arab thugs for murdering Jews, once upped his erstwhile mentor and arch terrorist, Yasser Arafat, by spewing another Arabian Nights hallucinatory diatribe while at the United Nations Security Council. It went as follows:


“We are the descendants of the Canaanites that lived in the land of Palestine 5,000 years ago and continuously remained there to this day.”


We should remember that the grisly, blood-soaked Arafat had falsely and ludicrously claimed that the Arabs, who call themselves Palestinians, were also descended from the Philistines. But then the followers of the ‘religion of peace’ will tell you that even Adam was a Muslim. Loony tunes for loony people!


But let’s come back to reality and deconstruct the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians. There is no such thing as a Palestinian people; no such thing as a Palestinian history; and no Palestinian language exists. The present-day so-called ‘Palestinians’ are Arab people sharing an overwhelmingly Muslim Arab culture, ethnicity and language identical to their fellow Arabs in the Middle East and North Africa, with few if any distinctions. They are primarily the descendants of those itinerant Arabs who illegally flooded British Mandatory Palestine from stagnant Arab territories as far away as Sudan, Egypt, Syria and what was Mesopotamia (modern Iraq). They were attracted during the late 19th and early 20th century by new employment opportunities created by the Jewish pioneers whose heroic efforts were turning the land green again and restoring centuries of neglect which the ancestral Jewish homeland had endured under a succession of alien occupations.


Britain, during its Mandate over the territory, turned a blind eye to the flood of illegal Arab aliens entering, while at the same time often arbitrarily limiting Jewish immigration into their ancestral Biblical land. This was a betrayal of the Mandate given to Britain to facilitate a Jewish Homeland in the geographical territory then known as Palestine.


Yasser Arafat, the Egyptian born arch-terrorist, was fond of creating the absurd myth that Palestinian Arabs were descended from the Canaanites and/or Philistines. Canaanites, without doubt, were the first known inhabitants of the Land of Israel before the first Hebrews, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and their wives, settled there, and before Moses brought their descendants back to the Promised Land during the Exodus from Egypt.


The Canaanite tribes lived both along the coastal plain and in the mountain regions, which run like a spine down the biblical Jewish territory of Samaria and Judea. Their language was similar to Hebrew and their territory stretched north into present day Lebanon and included the present-day Golan Heights. The Canaanites were finally subdued and no longer existed as a distinguishable people. The Philistines were a non-Semitic people who had entered the land from their homes throughout the Aegean Islands in general and from Crete in particular, in two waves. They arrived in Southern Canaan and along the Egyptian coastline and were known as ‘Pelestim and Keretim’ by the Hebrew tribes.


It appears that their first settlement may have been Gaza, which was then, as now, the partial territory and inheritance of the Biblical Jewish tribe of Judah. Later they settled in Ashdod, Ashkelon, Gat and Ekron: the Pentapolis. The territory was primarily along the coastal Mediterranean and they attempted at different times to invade Judah but were turned back by the various Jewish Biblical heroes, and later defeated by King David. From that time onward, they were diminished as a threat and as a separate people, finally disappearing from history. Any claim to this lineage by the Arabs who call themselves ‘Palestinians’ is as absurd as that of links with the early Canaanites.


Moving fast forward to 73 CE, the first attempt of the Jews to reclaim their independence from the repressive yoke of Roman occupation ended when Jewish warriors and their families fled to the fortress of Masada from Jerusalem. The Romans had conquered the Jewish capital city, Jerusalem, and destroyed the Second Jewish Temple.


Masada is where the heroic last stand took place and where the surviving warriors and their families took their own lives rather than be sent as slaves throughout the mighty Roman Empire. The Land where these stirring and epochal events took place was in the Biblical Jewish homeland then known as the province of Judea. Later, in 135 CE, a second Jewish uprising against ever more intolerable Roman excesses took place which resulted in three years of Jewish national freedom under the charismatic warrior, Bar Kochba, known as the Son of a Star. The Roman legions sent by the Emperor Hadrian were, however, too powerful and finally crushed the uprising which ended in enormous slaughter of the Jewish inhabitants.


There is absolutely no mention of any place called ‘Palestine’ before that time. After the suppression of the Second Jewish Revolt, the Emperor Hadrian replaced the name of Judea (Yehuda in Hebrew from which the name Yehudim, Jews, originates) with Syria-Palæstina after the ‘Philistines’ who were the ancient enemies of the Israelites. Hadrian did this to insult the Jewish survivors with the name of their hated ancient enemy.


No such name as Palestine occurs in any ancient document. It is not written in the Bible, neither in the Hebrew Scriptures nor in the Christian Testament, not even in Assyrian, Persian, Macedonian, Ptolemaic, Seleucian or other Greek sources. There is no ‘Palestinian’ people ever mentioned, not even by the Romans who invented the term.


Yet, here again, the fantasist, Abbas, who ranted in the UNSC, claimed Jesus was a ‘Palestinian.’


Why does every historic document mention the Jews as the native and aboriginal inhabitants, and the Greeks, Romans and others as foreigners dwelling in Judea while there is no mention of a ‘Palestinian’ people, neither as native or as foreigner? What is more, there is no reference to any ‘Palestinian’ people in the Koran, although Muslims claim that their prophet once visited al-Aksa (meaning the farthest place) which Muslims, for political purposes, later chose to identify as Jerusalem.


Saladin, a Kurd, whose people had fought alongside the Jewish warriors against the Romans, knew the Jews and invited them to resettle in Jerusalem. He had no trouble in recognizing Jerusalem as their capital city and the territory as their rightful Homeland. But he did not know any so-called Palestinians and to claim that Palestinians are the original people of Eretz Yisrael, the Land of Israel, is not only counter to secular history but is also opposed to Islamic history.


The so-called ‘Palestinians’ who claim Jerusalem want it so that they can take it away from the Jews for whom Jerusalem, known also as Zion, is the eternal, 3,000-year-old Jewish capital. Perhaps what links the modern day Arabs who call themselves ‘Palestinians’ with the ancient Philistines is that both are invaders. The Philistines wanted to take from the Israelites the Holy Ark of the Covenant, while today’s so-called ‘Palestinian Arabs’ want to take from the Jewish people both the Holy City of the Covenant, Jerusalem, and the very God given Land of Israel.


So let me close, beginning with the words of a Christian Arab, Joseph Farah, in Myths of the Middle East. Mr. Farah has made his home here in America and knows of what he writes:


“There has never been a land known as Palestine governed by Palestinians. “Palestinians are Arabs, indistinguishable from Jordanians (another recent invention), Syrians, Iraqis, etc. Keep in mind that the Arabs control 99.9 per cent of the Middle East lands. Israel represents one-tenth of one per cent of the landmass. But that’s too much for the Muslim Arabs. They want it all. And that is ultimately what the Muslim Arab Hamas terrorism in Israel is about today….No matter how many land concessions the Israelis make from their tiny homeland, it will never be enough.”



Pre 1967:


In Their own Words.


1937. Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi to the Peel Commission. “There is no such country as Palestine. ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented. There is no Palestine in the Bible. Our country was for centuries part of Syria.”


1946. Professor Philip Hitti,Arab historian, “It is common knowledge that Palestine is nothing but Southern Syria. There is no such thing as ‘Palestine’ in history -absolutely not.”


May 1947. Representative of the Arab Higher Committee at the United Nations issued a statement that, “Palestine was part of the Province of Syria” and that politically the Arabs of Palestine were not independent in the sense of forming a separate political entity.” A few years later, Ahmed Shuqeiri, then chairman of the PLO, told the Security Council: “It is common knowledge that Palestine is nothing but southern Syria.”


1956. Saudi Arabia Representative at the United Nations, “It is common knowledge that Palestine is nothing but Southern Syria.”



Post 1967:


Zuhair Muhsin, military commander of the PLO and member of the PLO Executive Council. “Never forget this one point: There is no such thing as a Palestinian people, there is no Palestinian entity, there is only Syria. We are an integral part of the Syrian people. It is only for political reasons that we carefully underline our Palestinian identity . . . yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity serves only tactical purposes. The founding of a Palestinian state is a new tool in the continuing battle against Israel.”


Hafez Assad, Syrian Dictator, to the arch terrorist and PLO leader, Yasser Arafat. “You do not represent Palestine as much as we do. Never forget this one point: There is no such thing as a Palestinian people, there is no Palestinian entity, there is only Syria. The fact is that today’s ‘Palestinians’ are immigrants from the surrounding nations! I grew up well knowing the history and origins of today’s Palestinians as being from Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Muslim Sherkas from Russia, Muslims from Bosnia, and the Jordanians next door. You are an integral part of the Syrian people; Palestine is an integral part of Syria. Therefore, it is we, the Syrian authorities, who are the true representatives of the Palestinian people.”



Reports from travelers to the Holy Land before its restoration by Jewish returnees.


Mark Twain, “The Innocents Abroad”, 1867.


“There is not a solitary village throughout its whole extent (valley of Jezreel, Galilee); not for thirty miles in either direction….One may ride ten miles hereabouts and not see ten human beings. For the sort of solitude to make one dreary, come to Galilee….Nazareth is forlorn….Jericho lies a mouldering ruin….Bethlehem and Bethany, in their poverty and humiliation….untenanted by any living creature “… A desolate country whose soil is rich enough, but is given over wholly to weeds….a silent, mournful expanse, a desolation…. We never saw a human being on the whole route.”


In 1590.A simple English visitor to Jerusalem wrote: “Nothing there is to be seen but a little of the old walls, which is yet remaining and all the rest is grass, moss and weeds much like to a piece of rank or moist ground.”


Thomas Shaw, British archaeologist, mid-1700s. “Palestine is a ruined and desolate land.”


Count Constantine François Volney,18th century French author and historian. “The Arabs themselves cannot be considered but temporary residents. They pitched their tents in its grazing fields or built their places of refuge in its ruined cities. They created nothing in it. Since they were strangers to the land, they never became its masters. The desert wind that brought them hither could one day carry them away without their leaving behind them any sign of their passage through it.”


James Finn, British Consul in 1857. “The country has remained ‘The Holy Land’ in the religious and historic consciousness of mankind, which associated it with the Bible and the history of the Jewish people.”


And now, for some conclusions:


That the world has fallen hook, line and sinker for duplicitous Arab propaganda speaks to the success of one of the biggest scams ever perpetrated. And students at American Universities of lower learning, with minds now filled with poisonous Marxist and Islamist propaganda, riot in support of Muslim Hamas monsters who took turns raping young women until they died from their ghastly wounds.


These were the same Arabs who beheaded babies, who baked babies alive in ovens, who delighted in raping women while videotaping them in their agony on that terrible day of October 7, 2023. Then they gleefully sent the pictures and videos back to their celebrating Muslim Arab families in Gaza; those same Arab ghouls who call themselves Palestinians.


And now in America, the land of the free and the home of the brave, we hear empty headed American students tragically joining with the Muslim students, those here on visas, chanting Death to America and screaming foul anti-Jewish tropes. One wonders if these students will ever feel shame.


7 Suggestions For Improved Emotional Health

1. No complaining.

The habit of complaining—out loud to others or in our own self-talk—is one of the nastiest and most unhealthy coping mechanisms there is.

In exchange for a brief and superficial ego boost, chronic complaining nearly always leads to a constellation of unhelpful secondary habits from gossiping and venting to rumination and self-pity, which, in addition to making us pretty unpleasant to be around, tend to erode our self-esteem and depress our mood into bouts of irritability, shame, resentment, and apathy—which we then go on to complain about.

In an age enamored with setting boundaries on the “toxic” people in our lives, we seem remarkably unwilling to set boundaries on our own unsavory habits. Complaining is one I’m working especially hard to avoid because of how many destructive downstream effects it has.

2. Never worry in your head.

It’s inevitable that worries will pop into mind. What’s not inevitable is that we choose to elaborate on them by worrying.

Being aware of this distinction—and fairly ruthless with ourselves about being compassionate with the former and taking responsibility for the latter—is the single most important way to avoid excess anxiety and all the stress, overwhelm, insomnia, burnout, and chronic fatigue that comes with it. So the rule I have for myself is that I’m allowed to worry, but only on paper, never in my head.

If a worry pops into mind, that’s a decision point: I can either accept it, tolerate it, and refocus my attention onto something else; or I can pull out a notepad and start writing down my worries, one of the main benefits of which is that I can’t write nearly as fast as I can think—and because the intensity of our anxiety is proportional to the amount of worrying we do, if I constrain my speed of worrying to the speed of writing, I end up having a lot less anxiety.

During times when I’m especially vulnerable to worrying and anxiety, I make time to schedule my worry.

3. Validate the emotion, control your attention.

Even as a psychologist, it’s surprisingly easy to fall into the trap of assuming that because an emotion feels bad, it is bad—and therefore I need to do something about it.

Of course, doing something about a difficult emotion like anger, guilt, or anxiety usually means trying to get rid of it or avoid it—both of which only make things worse long term. The solution I still need constant reminding of is to accept the emotion and be willing to have it (no matter how unpleasant) and then to get on with life anyway.

So this little rule to validate the emotion, control the attention helps me to A) briefly acknowledge the emotion and remind myself that it’s okay to feel whatever I’m feeling, then B) take control over my attention and choose consciously what to focus on rather than impulsively reacting to my emotions.

Validation and attentional control are arguably the two most important skills in all of emotional health. But like most skills, they take practice to develop and maintain. Emotional fitness > emotional intelligence.

4. “It’s not who I am underneath, but what I do that defines me.”

Yes, it’s a quote from Batman. And… it’s also an immensely important and helpful insight into the nature of identity, self-esteem, and emotional health.

It’s currently popular among both consumers and producers of mental health wisdom that who we are (including our emotional struggles) is primarily a function of factors over which we have little to no control—from our genetics and brain chemistry to our parent’s lack of sensitivity and affection when we were young. Naturally, this feels validating and relieving in the moment to externalize our struggles onto things over which we can’t control—and as a result, can’t be held responsible for. And while of course it is true that external things do influence us, it’s a treacherous mistake to convince ourselves that that’s the whole story.

I’ve found that the most productive way through most of my own emotional struggles is to focus almost exclusively on my own behaviors (physical and mental) as determinants of my wellbeing—in large part because they’re the only things I have direct control over.

We are not defined by our problems; but we are defined by how we respond to them.

5. Produce more than you consume.

Being consistently productive is one of the best ways I’ve learned to bolster my emotional health. And while there’s obviously an unhealthy version of productivity associated with burnout, overwork, etc., I think all the hand wringing about toxic productivity is mostly a way to avoid the hard work of figuring out what healthy productivity actually means and looks like in our own lives.


For me, healthy productivity means working hard to make things that are both meaningful and enjoyable for me to build and helpful and interesting to others. 

6. Solve the real problem.

Many of my problems in life have come down to letting myself be hoodwinked by fake problems…

The human mind has a spectacular capacity to create fake problems as a way to avoid the emotional discomfort of tackling real problems.

So much of emotional health comes down to cultivating a sensitivity to fake problems, ignoring them, and then being willing to confront the real ones assertively.

7. I am responsible for what I want.

This is the most tenuous of the seven because I’m still testing it. But the basic idea is something I’ve been chewing on ever since reading Luke Burgis’s book Wanting, which is about Rene Girard’s theory of mimetic desire, the central premise of which is that most of our desires—and what we end up wanting and pursuing as a result—are very often the result of seeing and imitating what other people want.

I find this intriguing because, while we tend to think of our desires as relatively innate and fixed—I didn’t choose to like vanilla ice-cream more than chocolate, or iPhones vs Androids, it’s just the way I’m wired!—the reality may be that we have far more control over our desires than we think. And along with that control, comes responsibility. Which leads to this final rule: I am responsible for what I want.

The hypothesis I’m playing with is that operating as if this is true will make me healthier and happier than the alternative.

A couple of examples:

On exercise… Will I be happier and healthier in the long run if I resign myself to the feeling that I just don’t enjoy lifting weights? Or, is it possible for me to cultivate a genuine desire for lifting weights and actually want to do it?

On creative work… Will I be happier and healthier in the long run if I resign myself to the feeling that I’m a writer, not an investor? Or, is it possible that—however scary and intimidating—I could cultivate an authentic desire for investing instead of just writing?

I’ll end with an uncomfortable quote from Luke’s book about what’s required to change how we desire:

One thing that every spiritual tradition is clear about is that changing how we desire, at least in a positive way, requires suffering. Nobody wants to let go of thin desires.

7 Suggestions for Happiness

Happiness is a paradoxical goal. We all want to be happy, yet we often fail spectacularly at predicting what will make us happy.

We pursue goals like wealth, fitness, status and mastery only to find that achieving them doesn’t really change our lives very much. In contrast, we often deliberately make ourselves miserable: we worry about things we cannot control, hold grudges against people we cannot influence, and spend time on activities we don’t truly value.

1. Embrace the seasons of your life.

Unhappiness is wishing you could be at the beach when it is snowing. You can’t control the weather, and daydreaming about a possibility that isn’t practical doesn’t make you better off.

A major philosophical tension in the pursuit of happiness is the conflict between accepting things as they are and striving to change them for the better. There is a third way: accepting the broadly unchangeable factors of your life while seeking to make the most of the things under your control.

Weather is an apt analogy for this. Every phase of life is a season that affords some possibilities and constrains others. Happiness is largely about maximizing the opportunities afforded by your current stage of life—and not despairing of the constraints.

2. Striving is good, but achieving is overrated.

Most of the time, achieving goals won’t make you any happier than you are right now.1

While some believe this fact about human nature implies striving is wasteful, I think it’s more accurate to say that while achieving goals is overrated, striving toward them is underrated. 

Goals, projects, interests and pursuits absorb our attention in positive directions. They take us away from abstract worrying or depressive navel-gazing. Activity is energizing, which is one reason why a crucial part of treatment for depression is simply getting patients to do more things.

The secret of the pursuit of happiness is that happiness is in the pursuit.

3. Meet other people more than halfway.

We are a chronically self-obsessed species. Nearly all of our thoughts are directed towards ourselves. Even our outwardly directed thoughts are often self-centered: We care about our relationship with other people. Absent our interest in them, we direct vanishingly little mental capacity towards others’ viewpoints.

This observation may seem cynical, but I’d argue it’s quite useful: if you believe everyone is self-obsessed, it implies you shouldn’t overweigh how much time others spend thinking about you. 

Relationships can break down because our slights to others are often invisible to us. In contrast, we feel the sting of every missed birthday wish, dropped calendar appointment or subtle criticism. 

If you accept this asymmetry, it makes sense to strive to meet others more than halfway. Be the one who reaches out to find time to meet. Be the one who congratulates and remembers important events. Be the one who is thoughtful and kind. When you aim to meet people more than halfway, you’re much more likely to connect in the middle.

4. Apologize often.

Everyone knows friends or family members who won’t speak to one another because of long-held grudges. While obligatory distance sometimes makes sense—especially in cases of abuse—many of these grudges began with some superficial slight that worsened over time.

Just as meeting people more than halfway can overcompensate for our built-in ego-centrism, often, apologizing can smooth over disputes and prevent feuds from festering.

5. Stop listening to people who are paid to make you angry.

We live in a world with billions of people. Statistically speaking, something terrifying, enraging and panic-inducing is happening to someone at every moment. In past eras, we were mostly able to ignore such things because limits in reportage and norms of journalistic practice prevented events that happened far away or were of limited newsworthiness from entering our field of consciousness.

However, algorithms designed to maximize engagement now funnel every enraging triviality to the front of your attentional space.

We need to curate our online consumption so that we’re not unwittingly making ourselves miserable over the statistical certainty that someone, somewhere, is doing something awful.

6. Look for small novelties.

When I was in university, a guy named Nick lived on the same floor in my dormitory. Every week, a shuttle would pick up the students to go to a nearby supermarket (it was a fair walk, few of us had cars, and this was Winnipeg, where winters can reach -40 degrees Celsius).

Nick had a habit of buying one new food item every time he shopped, usually from the international section. Buying a bag of Mexican candy or an odd-looking fruit you had never heard of before might seem trivial. It certainly does not require great effort, cost or ability, but he got to experience something new each week. 

I didn’t stick with Nick’s habit consistently, but I find the same small bit of joy every time I try a cuisine I’ve never eaten, explore an unfamiliar park or stroll down a street I’ve never walked down before.

We spend years earnestly striving toward things we think will bring us happiness, but the truth is that much of happiness lies in little joys and moments that we can easily overlook if we’re not paying attention.

7. Remember everything is a choice.

Within every constraint is a choice. Every forced option contains a range of possibilities. Behind everything that must be done is a decision about how to think about it.

In 2018, I went on a ten-day meditation retreat. The biggest lesson I took from that experience was that even within the most confining situations—such as the necessity of sitting in a rigid position for hours while only thinking about your breath—there is a world of choice available.

Psychologists have long known that our locus of control for an event greatly impacts our perception of it. Awful things feel much worse when they’re uncontrollable. In contrast, believing that we have control makes even horrible events bearable.

There will always be limits on what we can choose, but there will also always be space within those limits to make a choice. Reminding ourselves of that is often enough to regain the feeling of control, and reduce the feeling of helplessness in facing the things we cannot.

Footnotes

1. The main exception to this is when you are chronically deprived of some essential need that achieving a goal would fix. Getting out of poverty improves your happiness, but getting fantastically rich doesn’t matter nearly as much.


Sunday, April 28, 2024

אהבת הבריות וכבודן במשנת הראי"ה זצ"ל

 אהבת הבריות וכבודן במשנת הראי"ה זצ"ל / הרב יוחנן פריד



הרב יוחנן פריד

מן המפורסמות היא שייכותו של הביטוי 'אהבת ישראל' למשנתו של מרן הרב זצ"ל, וכי הוא אחת מאבני היסוד של הליכותיו בקודש, של התנהגותו האישית והנהגתו הציבורית. בספרו 'אורות ישראל' (בתוך ספר 'אורות') מוכתר הפרק הרביעי בכותרת זו, ובפסקה הראשונה של פרק זה כותב הרב זצ"ל משפט הממצה את תוכן 'עיקר אמונתו' כי 'אהבת ישראל והעבודה של הסניגוריה... איננה רק עבודה הרגשית לבדה, כי אם מקצוע גדול בתורה'. פסקה זו שימשה בסיס לספרו של הרב בנימין אפרתי זצ"ל 'הסנגוריה במשנתו של הרב קוק זצ"ל'[1], ונראה כי גם הספר 'סניגוריא'[2] של המקובל הירושלמי הרב רבי שמעון צבי הורוויץ זצ"ל שיצא שנים רבות לפניו מתחבר לתשתית רעיונית זו[3].

בשורות הבאות נעסוק, מעט מדיי, בצמד מילים שהוא כינוי להתנהגות ולמידה מוסרית נוספת שאף היא שאובה ממקורות חז"ל, ואמנם היא ידועה ומוכרת ואף על פי כן ראויה היא להגדרה ולהבהרת מקומה במחשבת מרן הרב זצ"ל[4]. כוונת הדברים הללו היא לצמד המילים 'אהבת הבריות' ולמשמעותו הרעיונית והמעשית במשנתו. אכן, מצאנו כבר אצל חז"ל בפרקי אבות[5] את תיאורו של אהרן הכהן בלשונו של הלל כ'אוהב את הבריות'[6], ואין ספק כי המילה 'הבריות' מדייקת במינוחה, וכוונתה לכל 'הברואים על ידי בוראם'. וכך אנו מוצאים בפרקי אבות באיפיון מידותיו של 'העוסק בתורה לשמה' בלשונו של רבי מאיר ש'נקרא רֵע... אוהב את הבריות'[7], וכמובן וכידוע במטבע הלשון של תפילת שחרית 'ברוך שאמר והיה העולם... ברוך מרחם על הבריות' (בכמה נוסחאות).

בבואנו לבאר את משמעות הדברים בהקשר להלך מחשבותיו של מרן הרב זצ"ל ראוי לדעת כי מבטא-לשון זה מופיע בכתביו השונים למעלה מ-300 פעם (!). עובדה זו אומרת דורשני[8], שהרי ברור לכל כי נקיטת הלשון הדייקנית הזו איננה מקרית, ושהיא לא נכתבה רק לתפארת המליצה. מרן הרב זצ"ל הוא מורנו ורבנו להלכות ולהנהגות, למידות המוסריות ולעיצוב אופי חיינו בכל עניין, לכלל ולפרט, לפיכך ראוי להעמיק בדברים שנאמרו או שנכתבו על ידיו בכל צורה והקשר, כדי ללומדם ולהפנימם באורחות חיינו. יש להבין את משמעותם ואת התייחסותם לנושאים אחרים הסמוכים להם באופן רעיוני או מעשי, ואף לאלו הרחוקים לכאורה מהם.

הנה אנו קוראים ב'אורות ישראל' באותו פרק שהוזכר לעיל (פסקה ד) את המשפט הברור וההחלטי 'ואהבת ישראל ואהבת הבריות תישאר בליבנו חיה וקיימת בלא שום גירעון ופקפוק בעולם', כאשר המסקנה הנלמדת המתבקשת היא כמובן במהות ההשוואה בין שתי האהבות הללו. בעיון שיטתי בכתביו, ולא רק באלו הנושאים כותרות הדנות במידת ה'אהבה' בכללותה, וכן באיגרותיו, בהסברים לעניינים שונים ובהעמקה של דברי חכמינו בכל הדורות, מורה מרן הרב זצ"ל למעיין עד כמה הוא מדגיש ומבליט את ערכה ואת נחיצותה של 'אהבת הבריות'. לדידו, יש לראות עניין זה כתשתית וכבסיס חיוניים להווייתנו, ואין אהבת הבריות הזו רק תוספת ומעלה של שבח בהתנהגות הייחודית הנלמדת מדברי התורה והמצוה. 'אהבת הבריות' היא זכות וחובה כאחת, הנגזרת מעיצוב הדמות והצלם האלוקי של האדם בכלל ובמיוחד של 'האיש הישראלי'.

להלן נציג בסיס לעיון חלקי בסוגייה זו של 'אהבת הבריות' בכמה מובאות ונושאים מתוך משנתו המקיפה והכוללת.

בשנת תרס"ו, סמוך לאחר עלייתו לארה"ק, בכהנו ברבנותן של יפו והמושבות, כותב מרן הרב זצ"ל 'מכתב גלוי' המופנה אל 'אחינו הצעירים תופשי התורה היושבים על אדמת הקודש'[9]. המכתב נפתח במילים העוצמתיות והחד-פעמיות 'הנני כותב לא מפני שיש בי כוח לכתוב אלא מפני שכבר אין בי כח לידום'. במכתב זה הוא קורא ללומדי התורה 'להתנער מעט ולשום לב לקול ד' הדופק בקרבנו בחדרי הלב פנימה' ולעסוק באוצר התורה הגדול בכל היקפו, ובין השאר גם לשום לב לאוצר הגנוז של החכמה הפנימית ולבסס בלבבות את יראת ד' הטהורה. ועוד הוא זועק שם 'כי עת לעשות לד' להתחיל לילך בדרך אשר תביא את הלומדים לרכוש את העט (היינו את יכולת הכתיבה וכו') באופן שהיצירות הספרותיות האלו יוכלו לקדש שם שמים ולתת כבוד לתורה, תהילה לארץ חמדה' וכו'. בדבריו המפורטים והמעשיים סוקר מרן הרב זצ"ל את גישתו להגברת והגבהת קרן לימוד התורה וקרן לומדיה, וראויות הן השורות הנפלאות הללו להילמד לפרטיהן.

לעניינו המיוחד של מאמרנו זה ראוי להפנות את תשומת הלב לפיסקה האחרונה, ולשורות הסיכום המופיעות בה. הבה ונקרא את המשפטים הבאים:

אנחנו חייבים לעבוד עם החיים ובעד החיים כדי לקדש את החיים, לרוממם ולעדנם... הלימוד הקבוע... בפרט בהמקצוע הגדול של הדעה והמחשבה, צריך שיעודד את הנפש וישמח את הלב, [ולימוד זה מאתגר את העוסק בתורה שבעקבות כך] נקרא ריע אהוב... אוהב את הבריות וכו'... [הם דברי רבי מאיר בפרקי אבות שהוזכרו לעיל].

ברור הדבר, אם כן, כי מרן הרב זצ"ל חותם את קריאתו הגדולה ב'מכתבו הגלוי' בתביעה מפורשת מקוראיו ומשומעי לקחו לנהוג כך הלכה למעשה, שכן זו הדרך שיש לילך בה! זו הדרך לפיה רואה הוא את דמותם של אותם 'תופסי התורה' אשר אליהם הוא פונה בהרגשת חובה חיונית לקיומם הראוי ולהנהגתם. יש לציין כי את דבריו הוא מסיים במילים מרוממות ביותר: 'הבו לנו לבבות, הבו האור הצפון'[10]!

כשנה אחרי כתיבת 'המכתב הגלוי' הזה נסתלק לבית עולמו חותנו של מרן הרב זצ"ל, הגאון הגדול הרב אליהו דוד רבינוביץ-תאומים זצ"ל (האדר"ת), ולתיאור דמותו מחבר ומפרסם מרן הרב זצ"ל ספר זיכרון בשם 'אדר היקר'[11]. בספר זה משרטט הרב זצ"ל בהרחבה קווים לדמותו של חותנו הדגול, תוך שהוא משלב קטעים אוטוביוגרפיים מכתבי האדר"ת ומתולדות חייו, אולם רובו של הספר מוקדש לרעיונות מחשבתיים-מוסריים של מחברו מרן הרב זצ"ל.

להלן שניים מן הקטעים האופייניים לדרכו בדברי ההספד והזיכרון הללו, ולסגנונו של מרן הרב זצ"ל בבואו לתאר את אישיותו של חותנו[12].

...כח אדיר כזה, מצד צדקתו ומוסרו הטוב והנאה היה גאון עוזנו ז"ל. הוא היה מלא אהבה, אהבת השם יתברך, אהבת התורה, אהבת ישראל ואהבת הבריות, [אלו] היו חרותים על לבבו. במידותיו הנעלות, ובלבבו הטהור המלא ענווה וחן בצירוף חסידותו...

ועוד בהמשך הדברים:

....אדם נעלה ומרומם מכל שפלות החיים, איש שכולו קודש לד', ושליבו ונפשו נתונים רק לאהבת השם יתברך ואהבת הבריות, אהבת תורה ויראת שמים, היא פעלה תמיד בישראל את פעולתה הרוחנית יותר מכל השתדלות המיוחדת...

מתוך דברי ההערצה הללו, ובקטעים רבים נוספים הפזורים לאורך הספר, עולה ומצטיירת לנגד עינינו דמותו הנפלאה של האדר"ת. באשר לנושא בו אנו עוסקים במאמר זה יושם אל לב כי מרן הרב זצ"ל מבקש בקווי השרטוט של האדם הנעלה הזה ובאיפיוני תכונות לבבו להדגיש בראיית התמונה הכוללת את עניין אהבת הבריות כמרכיב חיוני והכרחי בקדושת האישיות ובהתעלותה מעל שפלות החיים. ברור הדבר כי שילובה של 'אהבת הבריות' בתוך מכלול צדקותו של הגאון זצ"ל מראה על חשיבותה וחיוניותה.

הקורא את הדברים הנשגבים והרוממים הללו אינו יכול שלא לחוש את ההזדהות המלאה של מרן הרב זצ"ל עם פרטיהם, וכן עם התחושה שמרן הרב זצ"ל רואה בהם כלים חיוניים לחנך את שומעי לקחו ואת כל לומדי התורה, ולעצב באמצעות הדגשתם ותיאורם את אישיותם התורנית והיהודית.

תקופת כהונתו הרבנית של מרן הרב זצ"ל ביפו והמושבות מאופיינת בין השאר בעושר עצום של כתיבה הגותית-רעיונית, והוא כמעיין המתגבר. תודות לעבודתו של המכון ע"ש הרב צבי יהודה זצ"ל מצויים עתה בידינו הפנקסים הכתובים מאותה תקופה כשהם מתועדים וממוספרים[13], ומאות הפיסקאות הגדולות והקטנות האלו מלמדות על עושר ומגוון מחשבותיו ועומק רעיונותיו, וכמובן גם על הדרכותיו החינוכיות של מרן הרב זצ"ל הפזורות לכל אורכן. גם באשר לסוגיית 'אהבת הבריות', נושאו של מאמר זה, אנו מוצאים כמה סעיפי הדרכה רעיונית-מעשית, ונצטט להלן שלושה מהם:

ההתערבות עם הבריות[14] לפי ריבוי סגנוניהם, וקבלתם בסבר פנים יפות, מחזקות את הטיפוס המוסרי של האדם כשהוא מתחזק מתחילה בדעת וברצון אמיתי של יושר וצדק...

ועוד כותב הוא באופן ברור והחלטי בסופו של סעיף אחר[15]: '...וצריך להיות אוהב את הבריות באמת, ורוצה במציאותם ובשכלולם, שדעה זאת מביאה לאהבת השי"ת'(!).

והציטוט השלישי נראה לכותב הטורים[16] נועז בחריפותו ובחד משמעיותו ומפתיע ביותר:

מי שיודע בנפשו שהוא צדיק גמור מצד פנימיותו, דהיינו מצד בהירות אהבת ד' שמתנוצצת בדרך כלל אפילו בגניזה בנשמתו ומצד אהבת הבריות ונטיית הטוב והחסד שמקננת בו תמיד, לא יעזוב את מידתו ושאיפתו העליונה משום כל ניסיון שבעולם...

משורות אלו ברור שאין מרן הרב זצ"ל רואה את אהבת הבריות כציץ וכקישוט לכבוד ולתפארת. מבקש הוא להעמיד את חיוניותו של הנושא כשהוא מקושר באופן ברור עם המטרות והאתגרים החינוכיים של החיים התורניים.


הציטטות שהובאו עד כאן מתייחסות להגותו של מרן הרב זצ"ל בתקופות שונות ובעקבות אירועים מסויימים בתולדות חייו. יש לתת את הדעת כי כבר בראשית הדברים צויָן והוזכר כי בדיקה שיטתית של כתביו לסוגיהם תביא עימה למעלה מ-300 מובאות של הביטוי 'אהבת הבריות', ויש להעמיק ולהבין את תכניו ואת הופעותיו בהקשריהם השונים. מובן הדבר כי יש מהן המוזכרות בדברי ההגות בספרי ה'אורות' ו'אורות הקודש', ויש מהן שנכתבו בכתיבה של פרוזה והם מתחבאים ומובלעים בתוך תשובות הלכתיות ובאיגרות לאישים ולארגונים. פעולות בדיקה וחקר אלו יביאו עמן בוודאות את הגדרתו והרחבת אופיו של המושג 'אהבת הבריות' בעיני הרב, למחשבה ולהלכה ולמעשה, וראוי שכך ייעשה בעתיד. כאן הונחה תשתית להבנתה ולבירורה של מידה מוסרית וחינוכית זו.

לסקירה הלימודית והחלקית הזו ראוי לצרף את המשפטים הייחודיים מתוך כתביו של רבנו הרב צבי יהודה זצ"ל[17] העוסקים כמובן גם בסוגיא חשובה וחיונית זו.

כותב רבנו במחברתו, ומובאים הדברים בספר הנפלא 'אור לנתיבתי' תחת הכותרת 'הַכִּוּוּן הָרוֹחָנִי וְהַנַפְשִׁי'[18]:

כמו שיש מציאות מדרגה של התבודדות בחברת בני אדם, עם צהלת סבר הפנים הנמשכת מתוך גודל אהבת הבריות, שהיא באה עם אהבת המקום של עסק בתורה לשמה וזכיה לדברים הרבה על ידה, כן יש התקשרות והיות ממש בחברת בני אדם, בין בכלליות ובסתמיות, ובין בפרטיות ובהתייחסות מפורשת, גם במצב הבדידות הגמורה והנמשכת, מתוך הכיוון הרוחני והנפשי שהוא הינהו התוכן האמיתי והקיים של כל ערך החברה, בין מצד התועלת ובין מצד הנועם ובין מצד עניין ההוויה הנפשית והתאמתה במציאות טבעיותה, שכל אלה כלולים ואחוזים ומושרשים בו, וכל הנשמה תהלל י'ה בביטחון עדי עד בד' צור עולמים.

[1] הרב בנימין אפרתי זצ"ל (תרפ"ה-תשע"ח) מוסד הרב קוק, ירושלים תשי"ט.

[2] הרב שמעון צבי הורוויץ (לידר) זצ"ל (תר"ל-תש"ז), הר"מ דישיבת המקובלים 'שער השמים', ירושלים ת"ש.

[3] הכינוי 'סנגורם של ישראל' המיוחס לרבי לוי יצחק מברדיטשב (ת"ק-ת"ע) מחבר הספר קדושת לוי שניתן לו בזכות אהבת ישראל העצומה שלו, וכן הכינוי בעל 'אהבת ישראל' לאדמו"ר מוויז'ניץ רבי ישראל הגר זצ"ל (תר"ך-תרצ"ו), הם רק דוגמאות לשיגרת לשון ידועה ומושרשת זו.


[4] כותב המהר"ל: 'מי שהוא אוהב הש"י, אוהב את הבריות שהם ברואיו' (פירושו לאבות, דף לח) כל שכן שיאהב את ישראל מצד סגולת נפשם (ועיינו עוד במאמרו של הרד"כ הרב הנזיר זצ"ל 'יסוד הכללות' בספר הראי"ה, ירושלים תשכ"ו, עמ' יט).


[5] פרק ראשון משנה יב, ובתויו"ט שם: לפי שהם בריותיו של הקב"ה ולפיכך ראוי שתאהבם.


[6].וידועה הדגשתו של רבנו הרצי"ה ז"ל כי 'אוהב את הבריות' (במידת אהרן הכהן) היא מידה בפני עצמה אשר לא באה כהתנייה ל'ומקרבן לתורה', היינו שזה 'ערך חשוב מאוד מחמת עצמו, לא לצורך משהו אחר' (מתוך 'התורה הגואלת' פרקי אבות פרק א).


[7] פרק ששי משנה א.


[8] וראו גם בספרו של הרב מ"צ נריה זצ"ל בשדה הראי"ה עמ' 98: מי שהכיר אפילו במקצת את עדינותו וענוותנותו, טוב לבו ואהבת הבריות שלו, יכול להבין כמה מאמצים נפשיים היו דרושים לו כדי להתגבר על מידותיו הטובות, ולשים פניו לא פעם כחלמיש בתוקף ואומץ, בעוז וגבורה, שלא להיות סלחן שלא בזמנו, ורחמן שלא במקומו. ועל כן ברח מן הרבנות...


[9] אגרות הראיה א, עמוד כד, איגרת כז.


[10] הקדמת הספר 'חובת הלבבות' לרבנו בחיי אבן פקודה (תת"י-תת"פ).


[11] יפו שנת תרס"ו.


[12] אדר היקר, ירושלים תשכ"ז, עמ' מג-מד.


[13] "פנקס יג 'ראשון ליפו' (בהעתקתו על ידי הרב צבי יהודה זצ"ל) ופנקס ה (פנקס יפו).


[14] פנקס ג אות לג, ירושלים תשס"ד על פי כתובות יז, א 'מכאן אמרו חכמים: לעולם תהא דעתו של אדם מעורבת עם הבריות'.


[15] פנקס ג אות פח עמ' רנג.


[16] פנקס ה, אות לז, עמ' שלא.


[17] ראו גם בשיחות הרב צבי יהודה להר"ש אבינר במקומות רבים, שתחילתם בתיאורו של אברהם אבינו 'אוהב את הבריות'. וכן היה רבנו מתבטא שוב ושוב כי 'ר"ח ויטאל כותב בשערי קדושה (ח"א שער ה) ויאהב את כל הבריות ואפילו גוי'...


[18] אור לנתיבתי, שער נתיבות היראה, נתיב מעמקי הנפש, פרק קיח, עמ' קצא, ירושלים תשמ"ט (בעריכת הרב חיים י' שטיינר והרב י' איסר קלונסקי).

המעין תמוז תשפ"ג

What Would Have Happened If Other Presidents Sounded Like Joe Biden

Have you ever noticed that Joe Biden has a funny way of speaking? From his endearing way of retelling events that never happened to his uncanny ability to make up new words on the spot, it's a fascinating testament to his abilities as a communicator. If only other presidents throughout history could do the same thing!

We provide the following glimpse at what it would have been like if other presidents spoke like Joe Biden:

"Four score and seven… eight hundred… sixty-five million… billion million… years… anyway…": Honest Abe spitting numbers Joe Biden style is how it should be done.

"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this...uh, you know... the thing!": A truly powerful moment in history from Ronald Reagan.

"We choose to go to the moon not because it is easy but because my uncle was eaten by cannibals. True story, folks.": The space race was never the same after this gem from JFK.

"Look, fat, get off my plane!": Who could forget this classic line from President Harrison Ford?

"Yesterday, December 47th, a day that will live in infamanarathgary, America was attacked by the air and naval forces of the Empire of Mexico.": Franklin D. Roosevelt with one of the nation's most somber messages.

"Ask not what your country can do for you… ask… ask what… ask not what you can do for… ask things.": John F. Kennedy with an inspiring word from a golden era of history.

"Read my lips. No... new... hotel junk fees!": George H.W. Bush telling us all how to be prudent.

"Speak softly and carry...ah...well, anyway.": The encapsulation of Teddy Roosevelt's foreign policy that has guided us for decades.

"The only thing we have to fear is... pause.": No wonder FDR got himself elected an unprecedented four times.

Hamas Thanks College Student Supporters By Promising Them A Quick Death During Global Intifada

RAFAH — Hamas has issued a statement of thanks to American university students for their unwavering support over the past few weeks, promising that, in return, the deaths of university students in the coming global intifada would be relatively quick and painless.

"Our cold hearts have been warmed by the unquestioning loyalty of American college students," said Hamas spokesman Muhammed Muhammed Al-Muhammed Muhammed to reporters. "As a token of our gratitude, we will shoot you and blow you up instead of cutting your heads off while raping you when we globalize our glorious intifada and cleanse the world of all infidels, Americans, and Jews."

"Death to America. But, like, a quick death. Well, maybe it will only hurt for a second. But that's it. It's the least we could do. Thanks, everyone."

The Hamas spokesman was then cut short by an Israeli drone strike.

"We are proud to stand behind the brave liberators of Palestine," said Zander Penelope, president of the Columbia chapter of Queer Degenerates For Palestine. "As an oppressive white colonizer, I know I deserve to be killed, and am grateful that I won't experience much pain when they kill me. But if they want to cut my head off, that's fine too. I'm just happy to show my support to the movement."

At publishing time, Hamas clarified that their pledge would not apply to gay people, who would still be thrown off the top of buildings.

Clever College Students Figure Out It’s Not Racist To Call For The Murder Of All Jews If You Just Call Them 'Zionists'

BOSTON, MA — In ongoing protests over the war between Israel and Gaza, clever college students found an effective way to avoid being racist by simply calling for the murder of ‘Zionists' instead of Jews.

"Zionists clearly aren't people," student protestor Bashir Telum told the press. "I am allowed to call for their deaths and that doesn't make me a bad person or anything. You, know, because they aren't the same thing as Jews. Or people."

With data from hundreds of polls, more than 95 percent of Jews identify as Zionists. Zionism is the idea that the Jewish people are entitled to a homeland in the Middle East, with the establishment of Israel in the early 1900s as a fulfillment of this entitlement. To get around accusations of racism, brilliant college students have been calling for the deaths of Zionists.

"I wish death to all Zionist pigs!" protestor Cassidy Jones yelled at one Harvard event this week. "These evil colonists Jews — I mean Zionists — deserve to be wiped off the planet. Remember, I'm talking about Zionists, not Jews. I hate Jews! I mean Zionists! Man, this is a little tricky…"

Many American Jews say they're glad at least the protestors are trying to make a distinction but that wanting their homeland destroyed and everyone in it murdered seems awfully close to blatant antisemitism, but what do they know.

As of publishing time, protestors had also called for the death of all "people who support Trump" because they too are not really people and are a threat to democracy as we know it. . 

Israel Withdraws From Gaza After Learning Of Protest By 19-Year-Old Fine Arts Major Roxy Barnett

GAZA — Israel announced its complete withdrawal from the Gaza Strip after learning this morning of a protest from a 19-year-old Fine Arts major at Northwestern University named Roxy Barnett.

"Oh my goodness -- we've upset Roxy," said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as he was briefed on the protest. "I feel so foolish! The war is over, boys. Let Hamas stay in power, forget the hostages, everybody out of Gaza, immediately!!"

According to Israeli intel, Barnett had made a small sign out of cardboard and skipped class to walk around campus chanting. "When I learned of this 19-year-old in America skipping pottery class to chant how bad Israel is, I was shaken to the core," said one Israeli military commander, hastily canceling an upcoming missile strike on a known terror cell. "We thought we needed to destroy terrorists hellbent on raping and murdering Jews. But one look at Roxy's sign, and I knew it was time to pack up and rethink our entire foreign policy strategy."

As news of Israel's withdrawal spread, Barnett's followers praised her as a modern-day hero, with many calling for her to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. "Roxy single-handedly solved the Middle East conflict with a single sign," remarked one admirer. "Gosh, isn't it amazing to see how you can solve millennia-old violent conflicts by screaming at the sky on a college campus in Chicago?

At publishing time, in response to Roxy's latest protest, Donald Trump said he would no longer be running for president and that he had no idea how his campaign made her feel.

Ilhan Omar Paraglides Into Columbia Campus To Lead Protests

NEW YORK, NY — In a dramatic entrance that left onlookers both baffled and concerned for their immediate safety, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar descended from the skies above the Columbia University campus via paraglider, ready to lead the charge in the latest round of protests.

"Sometimes, you've got to glide right into the heart of the action and take the first shot," said Omar, removing her parachute straps as she surveyed the gathering crowd. "I'm here as extra ammunition for these students in our fight against oppression."

Though many condemned Omar's entrance as showing support for Hamas committing mass murder and rape, the Congresswoman remained undeterred. "Change doesn't happen from the sidelines, my friends," shouted Omar to the crowd of protesters. "You've got to get out there and tell President Biden: do NOT bring our hostages home! As my good friend Khymani James standing here beside me said, 'Zionists do not deserve to live'. Intifada Revolution! Ceasefire now! From the river to the sea!"

At publishing time, Ilhan Omar was spotted teaching the students how to make Molotov cocktails outside the university's Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies.


Thursday, April 25, 2024

Campus Demonstrations

What is to me most concerning is that many of the best and brightest young people in the most affluent, enlightened, open, free and democratic society in world history are actively and outspokenly [and often violently] advocating for a brutal, vicious, cruel organization that wants to kill every Jew on the planet because they are Jewish. 

I solemnly told my wife in a rare moment of  grave seriousness that I think that America is no longer the place for us and that we should make Aliyah. 

How surprised I was when she responded by telling me that we already live in Eretz Yisrael and have always lived here since the day we are married, so Aliyah is out of the question.    

פסח על שום מה?

 מקור שמו של החג פֶּסַח נעוץ באחד המאורעות הדרמטיים בסיפור יציאת מצרים – ה’ פָּסַח על בתי בני ישראל וכך ניצלו בכוריהם. הפסוקים עצמם קושרים ביניהם: “וַַאֲמַרְתֶּם זֶבַח פֶּסַח הוּא לַה’ אֲשֶׁר פָּסַח עַל בָּתֵּי בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּמִצְרַיִם בְּנָגְפּוֹ אֶת מִצְרַיִם וְאֶת בָּתֵּינוּ הִצִּיל” (שמות יב, כז; וכן בפסוקים יג, כג). מקובל על רבים כי לִפְסֹח הוראתו ‘לדלג’, ‘לחלוף על פני’, ולפי זה דילג ה’ על בתי ישראל והכה רק את בתי המצרִים. הוראה זו של הפועל פָּסַח באה בכל המילונים העבריים ואומנם בהוראה זו הפועל משמש בעברית בת ימינו. ביטוי מפורש לקשר שבין פֶּסַח להבנה הזאת מובע בשמו של החג בפיהם של דוברי אנגלית – Passover.


ברם עיון במקורות העברית מגלה שההסבר הזה אינו פשוט כלל ועיקר.[1]


לפסוח – ‘לדלג’


ההתקבלות הבלתי מעורערת של פָּסַח במובן ‘דילג’ שמורה ככל הנראה לרש”י. בפירושו לפסוק בשמות יב, יג הוא קובע “ואני אומר כל פסיחה לשון דילוג וקפיצה: “ופסחתי” – מדלג היה מבתי ישראל לבתי מצרים, שהיו שרויין זה בתוך זה [כלומר גרו בשכנות ולכן היה צריך לפסוח על חלק מהבתים]”.[2]


הוראה זו לא נתחדשה בפירוש רש”י אלא הייתה ידועה היטב כבר מתקופת בית שני. הדים לה אפשר למצוא בספר היוֹבלים, מן הספרים החיצוניים למקרא (מן המאה השנייה לפני הספירה), ובכתבי פילון ויוסף בן מתתיהו (מן המאה הראשונה לספירה). אף בוולגטה, תרגום המקרא ללטינית, הפועל פָּסַח מיתרגם transivit, ‘עבר’.[3] הבנה זו מובאת במפורש בספרות חז”ל (בדרשה שמגייסת את ערעור העיצורים הגרוניים ח–ע בתקופתם): “אל תקרי ‘ופסחתי’ אלא ‘ופסעתי’, שהמקום מדלג על בתי בניו במצרים” (מכילתא דר’ ישמעאל בא, ז). זו דרך המלך גם בפרשנות ימי הביניים, ובכללהּ כאמור פירוש רש”י.


פרשני המקרא נתנו דעתם גם על פעלים מן השורש פס”ח מחוץ לסיפור יציאת מצרים – לציון מי שנעשה פִּסֵּחַ,[4] צולע, מי שלקה ברגליו: “וְלִיהוֹנָתָן בֶּן שָׁאוּל בֵּן נְכֵה רַגְלָיִם… וַתִּשָּׂאֵהוּ אֹמַנְתּוֹ וַתָּנֹס וַיְהִי בְּחׇפְזָהּ לָנוּס וַיִּפֹּל וַיִּפָּסֵחַ” (שמואל ב ד, ד). דרכו של פִּסֵּחַ לצלוע, כלומר להלך במין דילוג, בקפיצות. וכן בביטוי הנודע בנאום אליהו בהר הכרמל: “עַד מָתַי אַתֶּם פֹּסְחִים עַל שְׁתֵּי הַסְּעִפִּים” (מלכים א יח, כא), היינו מדלגים בין שתי אפשרויות (“אִם ה’ הָאֱלֹהִים לְכוּ אַחֲרָיו וְאִם הַבַּעַל לְכוּ אַחֲרָיו”) ומתקשים להכריע.


לפסוח – ‘להגן’


ברם במקור מקראי אחד עולה בבירור שפָּסַח פירושו הֵגֵן: “כְּצִפֳּרִים עָפוֹת כֵּן יָגֵן ה’ צְבָאוֹת עַל יְרוּשָׁלָ͏ִם, גָּנוֹן וְהִצִּיל פָּסֹחַ וְהִמְלִיט” (ישעיהו לא, ה). בצלע האחרונה בפסוק יש תקבולת פנימית: אל גָּנוֹן (מלשון הגנה) מקביל פָּסֹחַ,[5] אל הִצִּיל – הִמְלִיט (כמו מילט).


אף פסוקי יציאת מצרים מתקבלים יפה במובן הזה: “פָּסַח עַל בָּתֵּי בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל” פירושו ‘הגן על בתי בני ישראל’. עניין ההגנה האישית מובלט ביתר שאת בשני הפסוקים האחרים בפרשה: “וּפָסַחְתִּי עֲלֵכֶם וְלֹא יִהְיֶה בָכֶם נֶגֶף לְמַשְׁחִית” (פס’ יב); “וּפָסַח ה’ עַל הַפֶּתַח וְלֹא יִתֵּן הַמַּשְׁחִית לָבֹא אֶל בָּתֵּיכֶם לִנְגֹּף” (פס’ כג). ואומנם כך מיתרגם הפועל פָּסַח בתרגום השבעים (תרגום המקרא ליוונית מן המאה השלישית לפנה”ס)[6] ובתרגום נֵאופיטי (תרגום התורה לארמית). תפיסה זו עולה גם בספרות חז”ל: “והקב”ה הגן על בתי בניו במצרים כדי שלא ינָגפו, שנאמר ‘ופסח ה’ על הפתח'” (מכילתא דר’ ישמעאל בשלח), ובמדרשים מאוחרים: “כביכול עמד בפתח ודחה את המשחית שלא יגוף את ישראל” (שמות רבה יח, ז).[7]


ומה עניינו של הפִּסֵּחַ לכאן? אין מנוס מן ההנחה כי לשורש פס”ח שתי הוראות שונות משני פעלים שונים: האחד מובנו לצלוע (פועל גזור־שֵם מן פִּסֵּחַ) והשני להגן.[8]


לענייננו – לפועל פָּסַח בהקשר של יציאת מצרים נוצרו שתי מסורות פרשניות כבר בתקופה קדומה. מימי הביניים ואילך נתעלתה אחת מהן על פני חברתה, ועל פי הסקירה כאן – אולי לא בצדק.[9]


_________________________________


[1] התיאור הקצר המובא כאן נסמך על ניתוחו המאלף של חוקר המקרא שמואל אפרים ליונשטם, ובעקבותיו של חוקר הלשון חיים כהן (ראו ‘מבחר מקורות’).


[2] בתחילה הוא מביא פירוש אחר למילה ופסחתי – “וחמלתי”, כנראה על פי תרגום אונקלוס “ואחוס עליכון” (וכן בשני הפסוקים האחרים בפרשה). הבנה זו עולה גם במכילתא דר’ ישמעאל בא, ז, ומאוחר יותר אצל מדקדקי ימי הביניים, ולדעת רבים אין הפרש בין ההוראה ‘חמל’ ל’הגן’ (ראה להלן).


[3] מילת היחס הלטינית trans שמרכיבה את הפועל ועניינה מעבר התגלגלה אל האנגלית כתחילית -trans.


[4] המילה פִּסֵּחַ (ברבים פִּסְחִים) באה במקרא לא מעט פעמים, גם לתיאור בני אדם וגם לתיאור בעלי חיים.


[5] פרשני המקרא ניסו להסביר בשלל דרכים מדוע גם כאן לפסוח פירושו ‘לדלג’. כך למשל בפירושו של ר’ יוסף קרא, בן דורו של רש”י: “מדלג ומקפץ מלהכות ביושבי ירושלם שסמוכין למחנה אשור”.


[6] בשתיים מתוך שלוש היקרויות (בפסוקים יג ו־כז). בפסוק כג בהוראת ‘עבר’.


[7] הגנה של האל מפני מלאך משחית (שהוא בעצמו שלח) מוכרת מספר שמואל ב: “וַיִּנָּחֶם ה’ אֶל הָרָעָה וַיֹּאמֶר לַמַּלְאָךְ הַמַּשְׁחִית בָּעָם רַב, עַתָּה הֶרֶף יָדֶךָ” (כד, טז).


[8] לפי זה “פֹּסְחִים עַל שְׁתֵּי הַסְּעִפִּים” קשור אל פיסח, והביטוי הוא דימויו של הנבוך והמתלבט לצולע הנעזר בקביים (סעיפּים הם ענפים) ונוטה בהליכתו פעם לכאן ופעם לכאן. בערבית מוכרים שני שורשים דומים – פס”ח (فسح) ופס”ח’ (فسخ) והיה מי שהסמיך אליהם את שתי ההוראות בעברית: הראשון שעניינו ‘הרחיב’ קשור אל הגנה, והשני שעניינו ‘נקע’, ‘הזיז’ קשור אל פִּסֵּחַ. אף באכדית באה המילה pessû בהקשר של צליעה.


[9] ייתכן שלניצחון הדילוג תרם הפסוק שבו נכרכים השורשים פס”ח ודל”ג יחדיו: “אָז [ביום ישועת ה’] יְדַלֵּג כָּאַיָּל פִּסֵּחַ וְתָרֹן לְשׁוֹן אִלֵּם” (ישעיהו לה, ו). יש מן הפרשנים שראו בזה הוכחה לכך שפָּסַח פירושו דילג, ואולם עיון בהקשר הכללי מלמד שבדיוק להפך: הפיסח (המתקשה בהליכה) – ידלג כאיל, וכמוהו גם האילם (המתקשה בדיבור) – ירוֹן, יזמר. פרשנות זו ברורה מן הפסוק הקודם: “אָז תִּפָּקַחְנָה עֵינֵי עִוְרִים וְאָזְנֵי חֵרְשִׁים תִּפָּתַחְנָה”.



A Miracle I Witnessed

This might or might not be a true story. 

Yesterday a man came to shul for the Netz minyan [which I was at b/c I spent the whole night watching Netflix - "Netz" is an acronym for "Netflix"?] at about 6am and put on his tallis and started davening. Netz was at 6:03. By 6:03 he was already at Shmoneh Esrei and seconds later he was done and was walking around saying his daily Tehillim. 

A PESACH MIRACLE!!! The entire davening from Brachos to Shmoneh Esrei in three minutes!!! [Or maybe it was not a miracle and he "skipped" זכר לפסח the holiday of "skipping" אשר פסח על בתי אבותינו]. 


Habit

 "The producer of old age is habit: the deathly process of doing the same thing in the same way at the same hour day after day, first from carelessness, then from inclination, at last from cowardice or inertia.

Habit is necessary; but it is the habit of having careless habits, of turning a trail into a rut, that must be incessantly fought against if one is to remain alive... one can remain alive long past the usual date of disintegration if one is unafraid of change, insatiable in intellectual curiosity, interested in big things, and happy in small ways."

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Dr. Belkin z"l

The following are excerpts of the eulogy delivered by Rabbi J.B. Soloveitchik at Dr. Belkin’s funeral, April 20, 1976 in Lamport Auditorium. 


There are two books, the open book and the Sefer Hachasum. The two books are concerned with two different questions, the Sefer Hagalul, the public book, the open book asks a very simple question. What did this particular individual do? What did he accomplish for society? What are his accomplishments? The private book, the Sefer Hachasum, asks a very different question. It doesn’t ask what did man do for society; it asks, who was he; not his accomplishments, but who was the individual himself? 


The private book of Dr. Belkin remained a Sefer Hachasum, a sealed mysterious book. The first question of the private book is, “Who was he?”, not what did he accomplish; who was he? I don’t know … I would like to use a certain verse from Sefer D’varim, Deuteronomy, in order to portray Dr. Belkin. It is a verse consisting of five words, but I believe those five words tell the story of Dr. Belkin. 


We just read those four, … five words in the haggada; “Arami ovaid avi vayered mitzraima.” I will interpret it in accordance with the ibn Ezra. A straying, wandering restless Aramean was my father and he went down to Egypt. Let me paraphrase this pasuk. A restless Lithuanian yeshiva talmid, student, who was my friend, Dr. Belkin. He also dreamt. He also became a visionary. Whenever I entered his room unannounced (I didn’t do it frequently) I used to find him dreaming. I simply saw the dream in his eyes. His gaze used to be fixed on something far: it was something unknown, to me at least. 


Now the question is, what did he dream about? He was an arami ovaid, a restless Lithuanian. What did he dream about? He dreamt of a generation of young American Jews who combined the good components of both an excellent secular and Torah education. Let me tell you, Dr. Belkin’s standards of lamdus, of halachic scholarship were very high. I repeat, he dreamt of a generation of young American Jews who would combine both an excellent Torah education with the capability of participating in the scientifically oriented and technologically minded complex American economy. 


However, Dr. Belkin, the restless spirit, the arami ovaid, the restless nomad, had another dream. And this second dream was bolder, more daring than the first dream. This was his original dream. No one shared his opinion, not even people who were very close to him … He wanted to show the Jewish, as well as the non-Jewish community that the Orthodox Jew is as capable of establishing scientific, educational institutions as the non-Jew or the secular Jew is. 


He told me once, when he presented the plan of a medical school under the auspices of the Yeshiva, to an internationally known Jewish abdominal surgeon, that the latter became so indignant that he said the whole project is not only impractical, but arrogant as well. And perhaps he was right, the surgeon. It was arrogant. Well let me tell you, the restless Yeshiva student of Lithuania was indeed …  tough, tough and arrogant. However, his arrogance was translated into reality. And isn’t a Jew an arrogant person, defying for thousands of years the whole world? And isn’t little Israel an arrogant nation, defying the united nations of the world? 


… Who was he? Answer number one: He was a restless, arrogant, impudent student from Lithuania. He dreamt of moons and suns, of heaven and earth. 


Let me give you the second answer. The arrogant dreamer, the restless Yeshiva bochur, the arami ovaid, was a great teacher, a rosh yeshiva … I spent my life in teaching, I know teachers. He was a magnificent teacher. He was, perhaps, the teacher par excellence … His disciples were the best trained boys in the yeshiva… 


He always moved in a straight line. He knew neither of angles nor of curves nor of corners. His thinking was two-dimensional. His code, so to say, his coat of arms. His lamdus, the symbol of his lamdus was the geometric plane. He did not engage in so-called analysis of depth. He had no trust in the thin abstractions of three dimensional thinking. But whatever he said, it was logical, it was plain, it was understandable… 


He is responsible for the fact, only he, that Yeshivas Rav Yitzchak Elchanan, now, as of today, is a great center of Torah, and that as far as the attainment of lamdus, good, real genuine scholarship is concerned it is the best place in the United States. You don’t have to believe me, just take a look at the young roshei yeshivas who sit right over there to my right. They were trained right here. They are the finest roshei yeshivas any institution, here or in Israel, any institution, now, at present or a hundred years ago… 


Answer number two to the question who was he. He was a restless dreamer, who was an excellent teacher and who was in love with Torah. He had a romance with Torah. 


Dr. Belkin was a charming person. He radiated, I’ll use the Biblical expression for it, Chaine. Chaine is charm. The restless teacher, the lover of Torah, like Joseph of old, again, attracted people. He was, indeed, charming. He enchanted them with his magnetic personality even those who disagreed with him, and quite often I disagreed with him, quite often. Even those who disagreed with him succumbed to his powerful charm. 


The charisma Dr. Belkin possessed was precipitated by two basic virtues. Virtue number one, let me use the Biblical expression for it, he was a baal chesed, he was a man of loving kindess. He was a kind person. And let me say his kindness was not due to character weakness. Sometimes people are kind because the are weak, or character softness. Sometimes people are kind because they are soft. Dr. Belkin was not a weak person. He was tough, I said before, and firm. He was a man who exercised power and he liked power. He practiced what the Talmud calls gemilus chasadim bimamono ubigufo. Kindness as far as money is concerned and kindness as far as physical efforts are concerned. If there was a person who was not appreciated by his own friends, this was Dr. Belkin. He was the most unappreciated restless dreamer, an excellent teacher and kind person. The most unappreciated in the world… 


… I’ll tell you something. He was, and this will come as a surprise to many of you in the hall, he was a saintly person. He possessed saintliness. I don’t say holiness, I say saintliness. Kindness alone does not generate or precipitate charismatic chaine, unless it is tightly knit with saintliness. And Dr. Belkin was a saintly person. And I understand if you ask me in what manner, in what respect, did he manifest saintliness, I’ll tell you. He felt it in four respects. 


First, he was a soneh betza, he hated gain. You know the Biblical expression soneh betza, to hate gain, to hate profit, to hate money. The saintly person is a soneh betza. And, Dr. Belkin while he knew the importance of money as far as the institution was concerned, he had no concept of, he had no desire for money as far as he himself was concerned … He died a poor man. He died a poor man because he was a saintly man. He was a saintly man because he was a great man, and he died a great man. He simply was a soneh betza who raised so much money, who was a wizard, a wizard as a fund solicitor… 


Dr. Belkin was a saintly person for a different reason. Dr. Belkin lived a simple life. It’s very hard to find people nowadays who are satisfied with a simple life, plain simple life. Dr. Belkin lived a simple life because he was a simple man. A great man, but a simple man… There was a streak of asceticism in him, a streak of prisha min hachayim. He lived not to enjoy life, because he hardly enjoyed it, but to create, to serve and to sacrifice and to die on the altar of Torah. He had saintliness. He could live a life stripped of all manner of frills and petty, petty enjoyments. He hated the formalities. I know that some people misinterpreted, misunderstood it. He hated the formalities and the protocol and the public etiquette even though from time to time he had to go through it. But he never enjoyed it… 


Dr. Belkin was a saintly man for a third reason. He had, what shall I say? I’ll use the Hebrew term, a lashon nikiah, a dignified speech. Judaism has always emphasized the significance of the word. The latter, if uttered with dignity and sanctity may create a world. The latter, the word uttered with vulgarity, may destroy a world. Dr. Belkin’s speech was clean and dignified. I’ve never heard him malign anybody, ANYBODY, or make some derogatory remarks about people. Enemies, who indeed wanted to destroy him, physically and spiritually, he never said a bad word about them. 


He was also a saintly person in his relationship to Yisroel. Dr. Belkin knew how to accept suffering; he suffered with dignity. Dr. Belkin knew, as I said, to suffer, how to meet crisis and how to confront disaster. He never complained. He never asked any questions. He never engaged in self-righteous monologues. Vayidom Aharon, and Aaron said nothing. A great man, a saintly man says nothing. He was silent, Dr. Belkin. A saintly man must possess the heroic quality of being mute at a time when one is ready to talk… 


… We prayed for miracles. Apparently we were unworthy of a miracle, it happened. We ask just, we bid you farewell. Lech Lishalom, visanuach bikaitz hayamim kechol chai. We promise thee that Yeshiva will be guarded by us and it will continue to be a great center of Torah. Your name will never be forgotten.