Be a Partner in the Pulse of Beis Mevakesh Lev - For almost 20 years, B’chasdei Hashem, this space has been a home for seekers—a place where Torah is accessible to everyone, everywhere, without a paywall. We’ve shared over thousands and thousands of pages of learning together. But to keep the lights on and ensure this library remains free and growing for the next generation of Mevakshei Lev, I need your partnership.
Your contribution isn't just a donation; it's the fuel that keeps these shiurim reaching hearts across the globe. Whether it’s the cost of a coffee or a monthly sponsorship, you are making this Torah possible.
[Donate via PayPal/Zelle: alchehrm@gmail.com] Thank you to my beloved friends for standing with me.
Scarrrrrrrry!
----
A recent New Yorker report provides a chilling look into the "Groypers," a radicalized faction of young men reshaping the American right. The report begins with "G.," a Silicon Valley professional who spends his evenings watching Nick Fuentes, a white-nationalist provocateur who broadcasts to hundreds of thousands. Fuentes’ content is a dark mix of historical revisionism, misogyny, and the promotion of "truths" he claims the mainstream media suppresses.
As W.B. Yeats famously wrote, “the center cannot hold; mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.” This sentiment resonates within the Groyper movement. Once a marginal subculture, they now seek to dismantle the Republican establishment from within. While G. was originally inspired by Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, he and his peers now view Trump as a "scam artist" who failed to deliver on his promises. For these men, Fuentes has supplanted Trump as the true vessel for their grievances.
At his tech job, G. engages in "meme wars" on social media, launching vicious rhetorical attacks against anyone he deems a "traitor" to the cause. Their primary targets are no longer liberals, but Republicans who refuse to acknowledge the "Great Replacement"—a theory suggesting a conspiracy to displace white populations in the West. They also target those who define American identity through shared values rather than "Anglo-Saxon ancestry." As G. said, their goal is to aggressively confront any Republican who "counter-signals white advocacy."
The disillusionment of these young men is profound and nihilistic. G. described a sense of being robbed of cultural beauty and innocence, lamenting the "hideous rectangles" of modern architecture and the ubiquity of explicit digital content. He said: “We have literally nothing to live for—we’re ready to die.” This sense of total alienation has led them to reject mainstream figures like J.D. Vance, whom they dismiss as a "race traitor" or an establishment tool.
The scale of this radicalization is larger than many realize. I previously estimated that 40% of Gen Z Republican staffers in D.C. are Groyper-aligned—a figure that caused significant backlash. However, an administration official said that the number of "very radical, very extreme Zoomers" is actually closer to 75%. This represents a "vanguard" of committed activists who, like the radicals of the Weimar Republic or the early Bolsheviks, do not need a majority to seize control of a movement.
As George Santayana warned, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” The parallels to 1920s Germany are striking: a loss of confidence in the center, a radicalizing youth, and a shift toward anti-democratic extremes on both the left and the right. In focus groups, young conservatives are now openly debating the "merits" of historical dictators and the legitimacy of the Holocaust.
The report highlights a growing "separation between where the Party is culturally and where the candidates are." While older voters remain loyal to traditional GOP figures, younger cohorts are gravitating toward extremist "podcast-era" candidates.
If a more disciplined leader—perhaps someone like Tucker Carlson—were to harness this energy, the political landscape could shift irrevocably. We are witnessing the rise of a generation that views the current system not as something to be reformed, but as something to be destroyed. As the second Trump administration faces its own internal pressures and perceptions of corruption, the radical right stands ready to fill the vacuum. History is not just repeating; it is rhyming with a dark and familiar intensity.
