Thursday, February 5, 2026

Why It Is So Hard To Be An Atheist


1. The "Black Swan" Blunder (Negative Claims)

Look, making a sweeping negative claim is a dangerous game. Just ask the pre-17th-century Europeans who bet the house that all swans were white—right until they bumped into a black one in Australia.

The broader your "No," the bigger your problem. It doesn't matter if you say religion is "false," "unfounded," or just "unproven." To make that stick, you’d need to be a walking encyclopedia of every religious argument and supernatural claim ever uttered in every obscure language on Earth and have the intellectual backbone to completely disprove - or at least raise serious doubt. Nothing we do in life is based on 100 percent knowledge. If it were we would never eat [maybe the food is poison], we would never get into a car [maybe we will have an accident], we would never ride a plane [maybethe pilot is drunk or never learned how to fly a plane]. You don't have 100 percent on your atheism any more than religion. 

The Reality Check:



The "Expert" Atheist: Claims to have seen it all. In reality? Finding someone who has actually analyzed every argument is like finding a unicorn.



The "Default" Atheist: Says, "Show me proof and I’ll debunk it." Translation: "I’ve already decided you're wrong; I'm just waiting for you to open your mouth so I can prove my own bias." * The Dawkins Special: Richard Dawkins—the loudest megaphone in the room—mostly swings at low-hanging Christian fruit. Judaism is the prequel to the whole franchise, yet he barely seems to have read the SparkNotes of the Bible and is of course completely ignorant of the rest of Jewish literature.

Israeli atheists aren't much better. They think Judaism is represented by a few viral clips of street preachers. That’s like assuming the entire global legal system is based on a single TV legal commentator, or that all of human history is summarized in a Yuval Noah Harari TED Talk.

The "What About You?" Defense: Atheists love to ask: "Do believers check every other religion?" Sure, but the believer isn't claiming to have scientifically disproven the "Crocodile God of South Indonesia." They’re sticking to a national narrative—like the Exodus—that works for them. They aren't pretending to be the Supreme Court of Universal Truth; they're just living their lives.

Atheism, however, claims the logical high ground. If you claim every other "house" is empty, you'd better have knocked on every single door. You haven't. Nobody has.

2. The "Everyone is an Idiot" Strategy

The atheist narrative is a great story: Science + Logic + Modernity = Atheism. The only problem? Reality. Most of the people who actually built our "enlightened" culture—the scientists, the philosophers, the pioneers—were believers. If science inherently leads to atheism, someone forgot to tell the scientists.

The 19th Century "Oops": Back then, atheists swore God would be dead by now. "Reason" was supposed to win; religion was supposed to be a relic. Instead, religion is still here, and the guys working the Large Hadron Collider are still showing up to synagogue or church.

Look at Daniel Turgeman. He’s a particle physicist at CERN. He literally smashes atoms for a living. If God wasn't in the particle accelerator, don't you think he’d have noticed by now?

The Punchline: To maintain the atheist worldview, you have to conclude that:

Many of the world’s brilliant scientists are actually morons.

They are all falling for "simple logical fallacies" that a 19-year-old on Reddit has figured out.

This is the "Flying Spaghetti Monster" logic. It’s a great joke, but it’s a terrible argument. If you think believing in the Creator of the Universe is exactly the same as believing in a pasta monster, you aren't being "rational"—you're just being condescending.

The Psychological Projection: When atheists get desperate, they pivot to "pseudo-science." They claim there’s a "God Gene" or that religion is just an evolutionary glitch.

The Rebuttal: If a gene makes me believe, maybe the absence of that gene makes you an atheist. If religion satisfies a "psychological need," so does feeling like the smartest person in the room.