Be a Partner in the Pulse of Beis Mevakesh Lev - For almost 20 years, B’chasdei Hashem, this space has been a home for seekers—a place where Torah is accessible to everyone, everywhere, without a paywall. We’ve shared over thousands and thousands of pages of learning together. But to keep the lights on and ensure this library remains free and growing for the next generation of Mevakshei Lev, I need your partnership.
Your contribution isn't just a donation; it's the fuel that keeps these shiurim reaching hearts across the globe. Whether it’s the cost of a coffee or a monthly sponsorship, you are making this Torah possible.
[Donate via PayPal/Zelle: alchehrm@gmail.com] Thank you to my beloved friends for standing with me.
Based on Parshas Mishpatim, Exodus 22:21-23
The Premise: The Anomaly of the Punishment
The lecture centers on the severe prohibition against afflicting a widow (Almanah) or an orphan (Yasom). The Torah outlines a terrifying consequence for violating this command: God states that if the oppressed cry out, He will surely hear them, His wrath will flare (Charon Af), and He will kill the oppressor "with the sword" (b’cherev). Consequently, the oppressor’s wives will become widows and his children orphans.
The Ramban (Nachmanides) raises a critical textual difficulty. The Gemara (Sanhedrin 83a) and the Rambam (Maimonides, Hilchos Sanhedrin Ch. 19) list the specific sins that incur Misa Bidei Shamayim (Death at the hands of Heaven). Surprisingly, the affliction of widows and orphans is omitted from these lists. The Ramban asks: Why is this explicit death penalty excluded from the codified list of heavenly executions?
The Analysis: Defining "Death by Heaven"
To answer the Ramban, the speaker first investigates the legal definition of Misa Bidei Shamayim. Is this punishment merely a prediction of a shortened life (a general consequence), or is it a specific legal status (Chalos Din) placed upon the person?
The Minchas Chinuch provides clarity through the principle of Kim Lei B’deraba Minei—the Halachic rule stating that if a person commits a crime incurring two punishments, they receive the more severe one and are exempt from the lesser. The Gemara applies this even to Misa Bidei Shamayim; if one is liable for Heavenly Death and a monetary fine, the death penalty cancels the debt. This proves that Misa Bidei Shamayim is not just a vague spiritual punishment; it is a definitive legal status (Gavra Katila—a "dead man walking") recognized by the court, even if the execution is left to God.
The Resolution: "Charon Af" vs. Legal Status
If Misa Bidei Shamayim is a standard legal status, why does the Rambam distinguish the case of the widow and orphan?
The speaker argues that the punishment for afflicting the vulnerable is fundamentally different from standard Misa Bidei Shamayim.
Standard Case: A standard Heavenly Death is a legal classification. The person dies before their time (typically by age 60), usually in their bed. It is a judicial sentence passed by the Heavenly Court.
The Widow/Orphan Case: This is not a judicial sentence; it is an act of Divine Wrath (Charon Af). The Torah specifies, "I will kill you with the sword." The Ramban notes that this implies a death of turmoil, war, or violence—an anomaly compared to the peaceful (albeit early) death of standard Misa Bidei Shamayim.
Therefore, this sin is omitted from the standard lists because it belongs to a different category entirely. It is not a Din (legal judgment) of the Heavenly Court; it is a direct, violent intervention by God fueled by "flaring anger."
The Theological Shift: God as Litigant, Not Judge
The depth of this distinction lies in God's role. In a standard sin, God acts as the Dayan (Judge). However, regarding the orphan and widow, the Ramban and Rabbeinu Yonah explain that God acts as the Baal Din (The Litigant).
The verse states that God "will surely hear their cry." When a helpless person has no protector, God steps in not as a neutral arbiter, but as their Father and Defender (Yariv Rivam—He fights their battles). Because God takes the offense personally, the punishment is exacted through Charon Af (anger) rather than clinical justice. This explains the measure-for-measure consequence: the oppressor’s wife becomes a widow and his children orphans, mirroring the pain he inflicted—a specific retribution that standard Misa Bidei Shamayim does not require.
Supporting Evidence: King David and the Poor Man's Lamb
The lecture bolsters this theory with the narrative of King David and Nassan the Prophet (II Samuel 12). Nassan tells a parable of a rich man stealing a poor man's single sheep. David reacts viscerally, declaring the man a Ben Mavess (deserving of death).
This is legally perplexing: Theft is a monetary crime punishable by paying four times the value (Arba'ah), not death. Why did David condemn him to die?
The Malbim's View: David was ruling based on the King’s Law (Mishpat HaMelech), which has broader latitude.
Rabbeinu Yonah's Insight (Shaarei Teshuvah 3:23): Robbing a destitute person is akin to taking their life (Kovea Nafesh). Because the poor man has no recourse, God enters as the Litigant.
This aligns perfectly with the earlier thesis. Why didn't the principle of Kim Lei apply to the rich man (exempting him from payment because of the death penalty)? Because this "death penalty" was not a standard legal status (Chalos Din) that triggers Kim Lei. It was a status of Divine Wrath. Therefore, the monetary obligation remains alongside the divine decree of death.
Conclusion: The Double Cry
The lecture concludes with a thought from the Kotzker Rebbe on the double language of the verse: "If you afflict him [orphan], for if he cries, cry out to me..."
Why the repetition? The affliction of a widow or orphan is a double affliction.
There is the pain of the oppression itself.
There is the simultaneous, crushing realization that they have no husband or father to protect them.
It is this double pain—the vulnerability compounded by the abuse—that causes God to shed the role of the dispassionate Judge and don the "Sword" of the avenging Father.
